International Law is elusive...mostly without a tangible solution or rule
To make a sense of it, i think, one must relate it with Cases and Precedents
26-30, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SomeMichGuy · M
Well, that's how all law is interpreted, but it is different from nation-state-based law, though I think the International Court has helped to further the stature of international law in terms of the law of many nations, not merely bi-lateral / small numbers of nations in highly specific treaties.
