USA court decision on presidential immunity

I do not understand how it could turn out like this. Can anyone explain in an unbiased way how it is constitutionally correct?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

ChipmunkErnie · 70-79, M

No -- the court was purposefully stacked by the GOP to give decisions like this. Following the game plan of previous dictators, step one is to suborn the courts. Just one example -- the German acts against the Jews were legal according to German law and courts of the time.

Heartlander · 80-89, M

@ChipmunkErnie I think there was always a presumption that the president had immunity. Like why wasn’t Biden arrested for breaking our immigration laws? Because he is president. The power over the president is the ability of congress to impeach and remove from office and the power of the court to restrict the president’s authority if it violates the constitution. And ultimately the people who have a right to own guns. This isn’t like Germany and the Nazis, EXCEPT when the president colludes with enough members of congress to form a government within the government. That’s what puts us at risk for losing our freedom and going the route of Germany in the 1938s.