@
Roundandroundwego @
GJOFJ3 it’s not the decision, it’s the opinions that bothers me. Please don’t assume you know my position when you don’t know it at all. The correct argument is the child’s right to life, over the mother’s right to choice over her own body. That’s not what they did here when they argued it. What they did argue is that the unenumerated rights are not guaranteed unless explicitly stated under the constitution… or having a long tradition with our country. Remember this has technically been settled law for close to 50 years. This puts all unenumerated rights at risk of being forfeit, including the right to sexual contraception, the right to privacy, the right to medical care, the right to marry if gay, and the right for a black and white person to marry among other things. At what point does an unenumerated right become a long tradition? This makes things incredibly subjective to the whims of judges and how they feel. Also, this case at it’s bare bones was about the right to privacy and right to medical care… not about abortion. By issuing the opinions they way they did, they chip away at those rights. What happens when it becomes about forced vaccinations instead? This sets a very dangerous precedent, far beyond the abortion debate.
