It's not a lawsuit -- yet.
At present: this is a claim (administrative) not yet a full federal lawsuit (though it may become one).
Allegations have not yet been adjudicated in court; the government side disputes key factual assertions (e.g., that Shouhed assaulted/impeded agents).
Video surveillance is cited by Shouhed’s attorneys and covered by news outlets, but full context — including what the agents say the business owner did — is still subject to legal proceedings.
The government’s response (settlement, litigation, or denial) is awaited.
At present: this is a claim (administrative) not yet a full federal lawsuit (though it may become one).
Allegations have not yet been adjudicated in court; the government side disputes key factual assertions (e.g., that Shouhed assaulted/impeded agents).
Video surveillance is cited by Shouhed’s attorneys and covered by news outlets, but full context — including what the agents say the business owner did — is still subject to legal proceedings.
The government’s response (settlement, litigation, or denial) is awaited.
This isn't really isolated either. Intimidation deters interference with the President's Agenda.
https://www.propublica.org/article/immigration-dhs-american-citizens-arrested-detained-against-will
https://www.propublica.org/article/immigration-dhs-american-citizens-arrested-detained-against-will