This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
exchrist · 31-35
There are instances in which it is the better decision. In considering price\cost efficacy. Shelter, feed, clothe,and monitor someone for the rest of their life or just put them to death? Obviously firing squad would be more cost effective.
But there are several factors to consider in making that determination. Frequency of crime (recidivism). Type of crime (murder or rape when compared to theft or religious persecution). And severity of crime (the extent of suffering involved in a murder, or crime; in retaliation or vengence compared to unprovoked.
So in some cases i do think it is justifiable but in general. Because of cover ups human error and (often racial) preferencial treatment\wealth disparity and the statute of limitations being 30 years(that's when all information might finally see "the light of day"). It needs to be carefully determined, administered, and enforced.
But there are several factors to consider in making that determination. Frequency of crime (recidivism). Type of crime (murder or rape when compared to theft or religious persecution). And severity of crime (the extent of suffering involved in a murder, or crime; in retaliation or vengence compared to unprovoked.
So in some cases i do think it is justifiable but in general. Because of cover ups human error and (often racial) preferencial treatment\wealth disparity and the statute of limitations being 30 years(that's when all information might finally see "the light of day"). It needs to be carefully determined, administered, and enforced.
exchrist · 31-35