Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Should the US revoke California's statehood?

Poll - Total Votes: 5
Yes, revoke California statehood.
No, keep California as a US state and just let them destroy themselves.
Show Results
You can only vote on one answer.
Since California does not want to adhere to federal US rules and laws, they should either secede from the US or have their US statehood revoked and all federal funding stopped.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
pdockal · 56-60, M
Federal Government's Actions:
When a state doesn't comply with federal law, the federal government can take the following actions:
Suing the State: The Justice Department can file lawsuits against the state to compel compliance with federal laws.
Withholding Funds: The federal government can threaten to withhold funds that would otherwise be allocated to the state if the state doesn't comply with federal regulations, particularly if those regulations are related to the funding.
Direct Enforcement: The federal government can utilize its own law enforcement agencies, such as the FBI or Department of Homeland Security, to directly enforce federal law within the state, even if it doesn't have the cooperation of state authorities.
Judicial Review: If a state law conflicts with federal law, a party can sue in federal court, and the court can rule on the constitutionality of the state law, which will likely be struck down if it violates the Supremacy Clause.
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
@pdockal
Judicial Review: If a state law conflicts with federal law, a party can sue in federal court, and the court can rule on the constitutionality of the state law, which will likely be struck down if it violates the Supremacy Clause.

Slavery is legal per the federal Constitution but a number of States have banned slavery. So far, no one has sued any of those States to restore slavery under the Supremacy Clause. I wonder why?