Revealing abhorence and criminal conduct violates what?

Help me out understanding this I'm slow and pale and stupid.

If you're in favor of clutching your pearls over secrecy violations that reveal horrible government actions, please explain why?

Each time that bad actions that run counter to human rights, violate American principles, or endanger world stability its an American obligation to expose it if you know about it.

The Times doesn't think so apparently but what's your opinion. I'm curious why you think that Assange or Snowden are wrong.

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

View 2 more replies »

SteelHands · 61-69, M

@allygator18 Progressive Democrats love Mussolini. That's fact. Read FDRs writings. AH wasn't a nationalist he was no less an authoritarian fascist than Stalin, and did not war with Russia over ideological differences.

If you're going to comment at least try to make a contribution other than your hate cult.

Confined · 56-60, M

@allygator18 Doubt it. The CIA runs everything. So he will probably bow to them and do nothing.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

View 1 more replies »

SteelHands · 61-69, M

@SteelHands Because I'm not the kind of guy that plays poker with a fleet of cruise missiles and aircraft carriers in my back pocket.

JonUK31 · 36-40, M

@SteelHands No. I think anyone who's employed to keep secrets should keep secrets.

SteelHands · 61-69, M

@JonUK31 That's what criminal mobsters tell their members. You won't find that in the founding documents and you shouldn't in the 3 branches of self government setup for human freedom.

This message was deleted by its author.

SteelHands · 61-69, M

@allygator18 This reminds me of an obscure but very true comment someone made to someone long ago.

"Wisdom has been chasing you but you have always been faster."

Add a comment...