Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

People want to expand immunity for police.

They already have plenty of immunity, that's the main issue. Even if you ignored all the other issues of law enforcement, the number one issue is too much immunity. I understand police get in sticky situations but I'm not talking about those. Too much immunity equals too much power and absolute power corrupts absolutely. There's some things officers have done that we as civilians can't do. Heck, there's been some politicians doing things that if any of us did that, we'd be in prison for sure. How is this supposed to work without any accountability?

The people pushing for even more immunity are clearly biased and should be called into question, they have cops in their family and their experiences are colored only with the best of the best instead of seeing the worse. This makes a clear and present bias. I think activists should be treated like jury members, they should excuse themselves if found biased enough not to give a fair trial.

https://nondoc.com/2022/12/12/back-the-blue-laws-gain-popularity-expand-qualified-immunity-and-other-rights-for-police/
Everytime a Cop kills an innocent person the city pays the settlements. If those settlements came out of the Police Pension Fund there wouldn't be people dying because they didn't signal their turn. The escalate, escalate, retaliate police have to be flushed out of the police force.
AJS30 · 31-35, M
I hate bootlickers.
GeistInTheMachine · 31-35, M
@AJS30 Most people are.
GeistInTheMachine · 31-35, M
I want to see them string people up and turn on their supporters.
we need to remove Qualified immunity
period
This comment is hidden. Show Comment

 
Post Comment