Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why not attack Jews?

I get that the author is supposedly the editor of a Conservative publication and that he's got a Jewish surname, but i've read this piece like 3 times and I still dont see much articulated about why anti-Semitism is either wrong or even counterproductive to the folks playing with it.

I appreciate the excuse for Trump, half hearted though it is, but I don't actually see much substance here.

What's the game here? Did he have to fight that hard to put this out and yet was vetoed when he tried to put in a little beef, or is he too, well aware that antisemtism sells to his base?

Is he trying to obliquely sell the risk of alienating the 1/5 of one percent, and if so, why?

I want to agree with this title, really, but, honestly, reading the stuff that follows seems to support the proposition that Jews are unprincipled money grubbers and that Phillip Klein is one of them.


https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/10/can-people-just-stop-talking-about-the-jews/amp/
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Ynotisay · M
He's a former financial reporter who has a book out about how government run healthcare would destroy the country. He's worked at the Washington Examiner and the American Spectator. Hardcore conservative rags. His niche is right wing Jew. He did leave the Republican party over Trump but...whatever. I don't think his point was to say antisemitism is wrong. I think his point was driven by a knee jerk reaction.

I lived in an almost all Jewish neighborhood in a major city. Reform, Conservative and Orthodox. And even they battle against each other. I'm an atheist so maybe my perspective is tinted by that but my thinking, based on what I've seen and how I was personally treated by many, is that the idea of persecution, and "us vs. them," is what drives the Jewish American train. So my thinking is that he responded because he had an opportunity given the rants of a seriously insane celebrity. It wasn't about anything other than "See how persecuted we are and what we have to put up with?" Most Jews, like most evangelical Christians, will never miss an opportunity to feel "wronged" or create separation. It's to be expected and, in my opinion, diminishes validity when real issues of antisemitism present themselves.
@Ynotisay You know a lot more then I do about the guy, for sure.

But, let's say his reaction was really a typical "Jewish" "us vs them" "knee jerk" reaction and persecution is what "drives the Jewish American Train," what good is he really doing expressing that this way in the National Review?

Seems like he's reinforcing a Jewish stereotype, and he's not offering much in a positive way while doing it.

Unless, maybe the us vs them thing is the point, I guess. I dont see that as much of a positive, but I suppose solidarity is a thing.