Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

How do you think cable companies feel about streaming/free TV? [I Love Internet]

So basically you have things like the Roku TV, and free streaming TV stations, like Pluto TV, and the Roku channel, and all other kinds of free content. I know, "nothing is free"

When I say "free content", what I'm trying to say, is that I don't pay $230 a month for cable TV. I pay $100.95 a month for a cable internet service. And no phone service. Internet only.

I bet the cable companies hate it that people are moving away from overly expensive cable and going to streaming TV instead.

Now, there is a problem with streaming TV. If your internet service goes out, kiss all those free channels goodbye. However, if you have an antenna, you can watch live TV. With my antenna, I get like 15 local channels, and that's more than enough for me. I don't watch much TV anyway, I'm usually doing everything here on the computer.

In any event, I'm still tied to the cable company with the internet service, but, I'm not wasting money on a cable bill, and I bet they hate that fact.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
ArishMell · 70-79, M
How are the "free" channels paid for? Advertising?
twiigss · M
@ArishMell Yep. But it's weird. You'll be watching a show and in the middle of it, it goes to commercial.

On cable TV, the show fades out first, then goes to commercial. With some of the free streaming channels, a set of commercials will just appear, but the show picks up right where it was cut off.

But yeah they show commercials.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@twiigss Briatian's ITV (broadcast service) has always taken something like that third route, when the programme is broken at intervals for advertisements.

You Tube is even worse, with videos broken about every two minutes by ads for nothing at all relevant to the video! I think you can have these omitted but only by paying an expensive subscription.

As far as I know, cable TV never really took off in Britain, but there are many commercial radio-stations here that pretend to be local; broadcasting basically nothing but pop-music and advertisements.


I don't know the Internet-TV situation here as I don't watch it, but from what little I have seen many are are single-interest (e.g. sports or drama) services paid for by advertisements or very expensive subscriptions.

My ISP is BT, and from time to time it e-posts to me advertisements for costly "smart"-'phones and its so-called "Halo" system. This is a high-speed broadband service that sells at a price to match, similarly, single- and very narrow- interest material like films or Premier-League football: apparently at one price per interest, around £30 - £40 / month - so up to £10 / week.

It would become very expensive if you have wide interests and tastes but had to rely on subscriptions, especially at one fee per interest. This is ignored by those who attack the absurdly-cheap "TV Licence". That finances the BBC's many broadcast TV and radio services, at about £3 a week, much less than a pint of beer; and covers an enormous range of interests in one go.

(If you have a radio only, no TV as I choose, you are not charged - which I admit is free-loading; and I'd be happy to see a more sensible Licence Fee of say, £180/yr for the lot, £50/yr radio only, to keep it alive.)
twiigss · M
@ArishMell Wow. That is way different then what we have here in the States. All we ever really had is cable tv, and now we have Internet, and then today's modern world we have streaming over the internet.

The cable TV subscriptions probably going to cost you upwards of about $200 USD. AM/FM radio is free, but it's mostly music.
ArishMell · 70-79, M
@twiigss Indeed! I don't know why cable TV did not last long here. It might have been slow to arrive and soon became overtaken by the Internet; but it would also have been very costly, slow and disruptive to install all those buried cables to so many homes.

Almost all radio broadcasters here use FM although some of the BBC output is also still on AM Long-wave; and a lot now on "Digital Audio Broadcasts". The latter suffers from shaky reception in some areas, as does FM, but it also comes slightly delayed, so you can't use it for reliable time-setting within seconds.

.
All five BBC Radio channels are primarily FM plus Internet:

Radio 1 is almost all chart and dance-club pop; R2 is becoming just an other pop channel playing older hits, having thrown away its special music-magazine shows covering for example, brass bands and theatre-organs;

Radio Three - mainly but not only "classical" including Classical music and related including music being written now, from avant-garde to film and video-game themes; hosts the annual 6-week "Proms" that is the worlds' largest and longest-running international music festival;

R4: speech, a very range: news and current affairs, drama, book readings, comedy, investigative journalism*, science and medicine, special-interest topics...

R5: mainly just sports, which in the professional world usually means just football and maybe rugby and football and cricket and football and...

Plus several digital / on-line offerings though mainly repeats, and "podcasts".

Also the founder and still active member of the European Broadcasting Union, live-music exchange scheme between public-service broadcasters. Among other things this relays the matinee performances of the Autumn season from the Metropolitan Opera House, New York.
......

*The investigations included a long series on the Post Office "Horizon" scandal, well before ITV grabbed the limelight with its dramatised TV documentary on it. One series tried to trace the origins of Qanon, and a present one has managed to track down and even interview "The Scorpion" as he calls himself, who masterminded most of the people-smuggling across Europe.