I need a distraction from the thought of having to go to work tomorrow 🥲

@BlueVeins lol, not used to a dude calling another dude honey lol

@Viper Do you like it?

@BlueVeins I don't mind. I just think of an older waitress calling me honey lol

@Stark I work evenings. It's 9:25pm here.
What time is it there?

@Bexsy I need to make a beer drinking gif

@Fullmetal you do. You really really do.

Hey. No sidetracking me. I still want joint custody

@Viper that’s not the way law works. This has set it’s own precedent based on how it was argued, that will far out reach this case. I suggest you read Roberts opinion. It’s a bell weather.

@JustGoneNow Yes, but some of the other Conservative judges opinions basically said this is an extreme exception and basically they don't see over turning anything else.

@Viper they can say that all day long but that’s not the way the law works and everyone knows it. They can hope it doesn’t call into question other cases that used the opinions of Roe v Wade’s original decision as the precedent for their own (and other cases that they personally don’t take issue with,) but precedent is a funny thing and judgements are always used to justify new future judgements, as they get decided. Judgements set precedent not in the yes or no of the actual decision but in the opinions of how it was decided, and this sent dangerous ripples through through the entire legal community. This decision (in it’s opinion) literally calls into question all of the unenumerated rights that we enjoy that are not explicitly stated in the constitution unless they are "deeply rooted in this nation's history and tradition." Judge Alito argues that the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment . . . has been held to guarantee some rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution, but any such rights must be “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition” and “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.” . . . And argues that the right to an abortion does not fall within this category.
You know how long abortion rights were the law of the land decided by Roe v Wade? 49 years. Nearly 50 years of the nation’s history and tradition. You know what unenumerated right has little to no time as decided law (for history and tradition) within our nation? Obergefell v Hodges which was decided just seven years ago and guarantees the right of gay people to be married.
Moderate Conservative Supreme Court justice Roberts (whom I have huge respect for) tried unsuccessfully to urge judicial restraint on this latest decision and said… "If it is not necessary to decide more to dispose of a case, then it is necessary not to decide more." Because using the Dobbs v. Jackson case to re-litigate an already decided Roe v Wade case causes major issues legally to many other decisions and cases.

@MellyMel22 awww mel 🤗 you always make me feel loved. 🥲😭 I have so many dead lines with school starting soon. So, I’ve been working a lot.

How have you been ?

@Stark You must feel so overwhelmed! I’ve been alright. Just hot 😩

@ineedadrink work is pretty fun tbh

@ineedadrink is your work fun?

@Stark It has it's moments but I let B.S. stress me out too much.

@JRVanguard omg hey 😌 I never see you. How are you?

@Stark I’ve been very up and down more recently but I’d say more up these last few days
On vacation from work this week

How have you been?🤗

@Selah omggg what’s the teaaaa☕️ 👀?

@Stark i was gonna link you but i think i was blocked lmao

@Selah DAMNNNN I thought you were joking. There was actually drama 👀 what was it about ?!

@QueenOfTheNerds hey girl. How have you been ? ☺️

@Stark Hey! I’m pretty ok. How about you?

@SW-User lol whhhy? It’s too late for me to be confused right now.

@Stark EXPELLIARMUS!