This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Diotrephes · 70-79, M
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
@Diotrephes
You're right about land being more expensive...
Yet actually they tear vacant buildings down here. Say after twenty years being vacant. So there is many vacant lots here.
You can't keep up with the maintenance being vacant. Therefore they are not up to code and must been torn down.
Long gone are the days that any structure will last more than 50 years without maintenance.
You're right about land being more expensive...
Yet actually they tear vacant buildings down here. Say after twenty years being vacant. So there is many vacant lots here.
You can't keep up with the maintenance being vacant. Therefore they are not up to code and must been torn down.
Long gone are the days that any structure will last more than 50 years without maintenance.