If the earth is more than 6000 years old then why do scientists admit they don't have all the...

that's like asking, if you're between 26 and 30 years old, why do you admit you're not 40 years old?

your logic is flawed, but that's where blind faith comes in.

Strawberrry · F

dont trust anyone who claims have all the truths...

1GHOST · M

Nope
If scientists are human and can make mistakes , who wrote the bible .....the hand of man / so it naturally has faults .
And the church has changed many things in the wording to suit its wishes over time .

Plus not all words translate properly so meanings get lost .

All old news 🙄

carseatheaddy · 18-21, M

Human have been around for 200,000 years while civilization has been around for 6,000, so of course science won't have all the answers yet, but they are still trustworthy

Pfuzylogic · M

It does take artifacts to prove.
The Bible has an unbroken lineage from Adam to Jesus.

kate21 · 26-30, F

I must’ve missed the logic in your question. Scientists should know everything if the world is more than 6000 years old?

Spitbak · 56-60, M

🤔I don't trust any of it! This planet is a puzzle boat and we're ALL on it, for better or worse! I believe this world has been here longer than 6000 years but I don't agree with billions of years or even millions! NO ONE knows! That's part of the mystery of our existence! But the powers that be wish for us to just shut up and believe and obey everything they taught us in school, another bullshit institution! Religion is just another form of manipulation! We were programmed from the beginning and I believe it is up to us ALL to figure this shit out together and stop fighting amongst ourselves and quit letting these puppets lead us into a freakin' Hell hole! But, that's just me I guess!