DonaldTrumpet · 70-79, M

ajlopez · 26-30, M
@DonaldTrumpet wat?
DonaldTrumpet · 70-79, M
@ajlopez Ur welCUMEZ
room101 · 51-55, M
It depends on how similar your final piece is to the original sketch. Also, and I may have misunderstood you on this, you imply that you are going to incorporate the original sketch into your piece. While that may not be considered as plagiarism necessarily, it may be deemed as lacking in originality, if the original sketch has more proportional emphasis than your own work.
View 2 more replies »
I don't think a pose can be considered plagerized. If your painting is different than the source material I wouldn't worry about it.
@ajlopez well consider this:
You paint a sphere. A shape. Its been done many times because you can't claim ownership of a shape.
A pose is just an anatomical shape. Who owns the pose?
You paint a sphere. A shape. Its been done many times because you can't claim ownership of a shape.
A pose is just an anatomical shape. Who owns the pose?
ajlopez · 26-30, M
@Callmewhatyouwill I see your point, but what I'm worried about is I'm not just copying the pose itself, since it was a sketch and not a photograph I would be copying the sketch. Along with the rendereing, lighting and technique applied to copy the posing. I'm worried it may come off as plagiarism. Plus the sketch itslef was not just one posing but four poses it was a sketch of a man throwing a ball and sketching the movement frame by frame. Thank you again for your response
@ajlopez I think you would be fine... But if you want or can go out and picture of someone throwing a ball and go off that.
Or credit your source material if possible.
Or credit your source material if possible.
Katfish · 41-45, F
No