Biden’s Amendments Hand U.S. Sovereignty to the WHO

The Biden administration is setting the stage to hand ultimate control of America’s health care system and U.S. national sovereignty over to the World Health Organization (WHO).

On May 22-28, 2022, the 75th World Health Assembly will convene at United Nations (U.N.) headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, with delegates from 194 nations, to vote on the Biden administration’s amendments that will hand over national sovereignty and authority to the WHO, which during the COVID pandemic, carried the water bucket for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) regarding the Wuhan lab.

On Jan. 18, 2022, officials from the Biden administration quietly sent the WHO extensive amendments without an official statement or a single press conference. These proposed amendments are written to strengthen the organization’s ability to unilaterally intervene into the affairs of nations merely suspected of having a “health emergency” of possible concern to other nations. If these amendments are approved, the WHO will have the power to declare an “international health emergency,” nullifying the powers of nation states. The U.S. amendments delete a critical existing restriction in the regulations: “WHO shall consult with and attempt to obtain verification from the State Party in whose territory the event is allegedly occurring…” This enables the Director-General to declare health emergencies at will and can be used to justify ostracism and economic or financial actions against the targeted nation by other nations aligned with WHO or who wish to harm and control the accused nation.

Liberty Counsel Founder and Chairman Mat Staver sated, “The Biden administration has now set America up for cede U.S. sovereignty concerning the health of Americans to the World Health Organization. The proposed amendments would give the WHO global jurisdiction over the United States including the authority to declare national emergencies. We have already seen the lawless abuse of power under Joe Biden by the Centers for Disease Control, which the courts have fortunately blocked. Americans would have very little recourse against the WHO. America must not give up its sovereignty to the WHO.”

[b][i]There's a vote on this, this weekend.
Americans - please contact your representatives TODAY to let them know how you feel about this incredibly stupid and anti-American development.[/i][/b]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

therighttothink50 · 56-60, M

Corruption of the WHO is the Biggest Threat to the World’s Public Health of Our Time
https://expose-news.com/2022/05/19/corruption-of-who-is-the-biggest-threat-to-public-health/

Excerpt from article:

Summary of Selected Proposed Amendments to the IHR
The WHO intends to amend13 IHR articles:5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53, 59
1. Increased surveillance: Under Article 5, the WHO will develop early warning criteria that will allow it to establish a risk assessment for a member state, which means that it can use the type of modelling, simulation, and predictions that exaggerated the risk from Covid-19 over two years ago. Once the WHO creates its assessment, it will communicate it to inter-governmental organisations and other member states.
2. 48-hour deadline:Under Articles 6, 10, 11, and 13, a member state is given 48 hours to respond to a WHO risk assessment and accept or reject on-site assistance. However, in practice, this timeline can be reduced to hours, forcing it to comply or face international disapproval led by the WHO and potentially unfriendly member states.
3. Secret sources: Under Article 9, the WHO can rely on undisclosed sources for information leading it to declare a public health emergency. Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, as well as others seeking to monopolise power.
4. Weakened Sovereignty: Under Article 12, when the WHO receives undisclosed information concerning a purported public health threat in a member state,the Director-General may (not must) consult with theWHO Emergency Committee and the member state. However, s/he can unilaterally declare a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern. The Director General’s authority replaces national sovereign authority. This can later be used to enforcesanctionson nations.
5. Rejecting the amendments:Under Article 59, after the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly, a member state hassix monthsto reject them.This means November, this year.If the member state fails to act, it will be deemed to have accepted the amendments in full. Any rejection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that periodshall have no force and effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------
WHO unveils tyrannical amendments in the name of health emergency preparedness
https://citizens.news/619954.html

It's Biden and his fellow globalists way of bringing in the TPP through a back door. Always scheming, always using clandestine methods, always attempting to fool the citizenry. Always telling you something that is toxic to freedom is good for you.

The midterms will mean nothing because Washington DC is one big cesspool
of corruption, thuggery and treachery.

A place where Demoncrats and RINOS pretend to fight as they conspire behind our backs.

We are existing within a nightmare because people have accepted a rigged election. Your only fooling yourself if you think your vote counts for something.