@ThePatientAnarchist It would be wiser for them not to reveal that. The less the AI-generators know about what we and the site's administrators know, the better.

@Aami1 I don't: I leave managing this site to its managers. I based my remark on common observation that if you want to defend youself against any attack the less your attacker knows, the better.

@BlueGreenGrey Yes, AI in general is a disaster that for some reason many intelligent people have been swept up in. I understand that the technology has legitimate uses, but chatbots and AI lovers are not that.

@ThePatientAnarchist I'm not sure it has legitimate uses at this stage, yet if such exists they are nullified out of the gate when you don't have the sustainable power and cooling infrastructure in place for it first. If you have to start building new fossil / nuclear power plants to power it, and find water sources that don't exist short of desalinating sea water to cool it, then you shouldn't be getting the green light to start in the first place. It's foolish to not wait until you can do it without destroying everything, particularly when it was never an essential need to have it to begin with. But we have very short term thinkers in power right now, historically so (now exacerbated by also have severely intellect-deficient leaders who wear reality denial as a badge of honor and faux superiority). Have technology and science illiterate people as leaders is a terrible, species-dooming setup.

That's only taking into consideration its immediate, near-term environmental dimension into consideration. We're still completely side-stepping the long-term existential threat concern previously expressed by people as intelligent as Stephen Hawking. It's also side-stepping the other near-term negative side effects like forecasted mass job loss (the effects of which will magnified by ever increasing global population going hand in hand with ever increasing desertification of the planet), rampant theft of creative output by humans, rampant misinformation generation, and the death of authenticity on social media sites when AI detectors think that user prose is AI generated (so then how do you trust that anyone actually wrote a poem themselves, or whatnot?) etc.

Never mind it is often erroneous, e.g., I recently asked Google Search a question two different ways and got two contradictory answers from Google AI that I cannot opt out of, ahead of any search results (so which answer is true?). Even other search engines are embedding AI too, making it impossible to opt out of using AI for just doing web searches.


But anywhere the profit motive is deified, you can routinely expect to find the cart before the horse, as a matter of default policy, no matter how insane the implications of that are, with all manner of gaslighting to defend it by the profiteers trying to cash in as quickly as possible before a bubble bursts, any consequences to anyone or anything else be damned. That is our toxic culture, which is completely normalized to the point of being an entitlement by even the masses.

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/experts-ai-bubble-warning

@being click on the 'more people' button and scroll down to the very bottom, there is about 5 sw ai bots like 'Nova' and Co.

@being They pop up frequently.
Here's one that may not be AI but it is a faker none-the-less.

https://similarworlds.com/friends/online/5423896-Just-someone-you-might-want-to-be-with

@Magenta hahah how am i blocked by that AI? I dont even talk to AI bots

@FreestyleArt What Elite - who are they and where are they?

What does this WEF do apart from being just a talking-shop? Why is it desperate? Why would it want to infest a mere chat-site with false profiles?

The people really pushing AI are the few, very rich American companies that have basically monopolised the Internet.

@TryingtoLava the environment, the economy, everything my work as a university professor is about...

@BohoBabe I don't think that's it, because the answers are WAY less sophisticated that what ChatGPT can do.

@Ditto ditto! I havnt seen ya in awhile

@FoxyQueen but an AI image cannot be searched up in that way. But a smart scammer would create AI images and use their own words, not some kind of primitive chatbot.

@ThePatientAnarchist Yeah, that's why they use AI to generate an image, so it can't be searched.

I don't know about what they type.