Have you ever figured out just how many comments you have made on this site?😅

Just did so... 40,338 comments

Go to your awards and use the comment award as a base to start.

For instance my last award was the 25,000 comment award. The maximum award is 50,000 comments.

Now go to your reply tab and page over one page and copy that url. Adjust the page number on that page by dividing your maximum award number by 20 which is the number of comments on each page.

So by a binary search technique divide the difference between your max award and the next award in half, which is around 37500 for me. If no comments found, divide that current difference in half. Keep doing so until you have found a reply of yours.

From there it easy enough just to keep on the next page button.

Keep this in mind when you're bored and your feed is dead! 🤣

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

DiliMarky · M

I dont believe you

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

@DiliMarky not hard to find out. I just said how!

DiliMarky · M

@DeWayfarer I can tell a lie when I see one

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

@DiliMarky guy, I'm not only not the only programer on this site, I'm also not the only programmer that has commented on this page twice.

So your lie detector is in bad need of some maintenance. If I hadn't caught a mistake, he definitely would have.

DiliMarky · M

@DeWayfarer No, you're wrong. I still don't believe you. I don't think you programmed this website

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

@DiliMarky I never said I did program this site! 🤣

DiliMarky · M

@DeWayfarer You said "I'm not the only programmer on this site".

See... I knew I was right. My detector was right.

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

@DiliMarky no I didn't. This is a copy and paste

I'm not only not the only programer on this site, I'm also not the only programmer that has commented on this page twice.

And that still doesn't mean I programmed this site.

DiliMarky · M

@DeWayfarer So why lie, I knew you didn't programme this site. Don't have to lie like that bro😤

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

@DiliMarky 🤣
Your the only one that has made ANY such claims of at least nine users on this post.

What are the odds? 1 in 9! 89 percent is good enough I think that you have lost the dice roll. Better luck next roll! 🤣

DiliMarky · M

@DeWayfarer Firstly it's 88.89%.

Secondly, you said your the programmer, not me. It's ok that your not a programmer, just don't lie about it.

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

@DiliMarky if you wish to be exact then be exact, because even your figure is incorrect.

It is a common practice to round numbers by adding .5 then just using the integer. FYI that is a common programming technique learned in basic programming.

Too bad you don't know it, because that pretty much proves that I do it so frequently that I don't even think about it. A common programmer trait.

DiliMarky · M

@DeWayfarer Why do you want to be exact? Sorry that I rounded it up. What are you the math police? Your one of those people that has to just correct everyone even if there 0.00001 off.

If you want to be exact then your wrong again. It's actually 88.888888888889/100

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

@DiliMarky 🤣 you are one complaining about my math first! 🤣

DiliMarky · M

@DeWayfarer Am I Mr Dewayfarer, I feel like you're blaming me for the stuff you've said.

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

@DiliMarky I think you are making up things to complain. 🤣

DiliMarky · M

@DeWayfarer I'm not, your just being a little aggressive to me so I put you in your place for lying.

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

@DiliMarky got to go.

𝓗𝓪𝓿𝓮 𝓪 𝓰𝓸𝓸𝓭 𝓭𝓪𝔂! 😊

DiliMarky · M

@DeWayfarer No DeWayFarer, I want you to have a good day. I hope something makes you smile today!

Love you