I'm supposed to feel sad [removed by staff], blocked me?

@InOtterWords Yes, and it is I don't find his moral form holds qualities? Maybe I should hold that in, instead of posting a broad subject like the one below complaining how I named a person, here.

[@you've broken the sites tos by naming him, but youbare probably already aware of that.

We are free to block and befriend whoever we like on this site, it is a reflection on ourselves how we react to it.

You criticise the person in question, and yet he is inoffensive, doesn't break the rules, clearly marks his posts. They are not to everyone's liking but he is popular enough.
He isn't posting rape fantasy stories, he isn't trying to entice children...there are worse things here to get upset about

@InOtterWords Okay. TOS of services are funny. I have another one telling (in private) no matter what she says he was abrasive (polite) .... Ambroseguy80, one of the few times I will use the name again, when he's not tagging what is not safe (*I'm fine with*) in my opinion is looking for smut. I have a very loose category for that, quite liberal, and is okay. Asking if there is something else (with no actual question) and then I get blocked? Yes I find it a paradox; he will be unaware of

He has never asked me for smut @dequesnewhistle

@InOtterWords Looking for display and here should be interchangeable?

Pardon? @dequesnewhistle

@InOtterWords Seems, bringing up sensitivity about misogyny here brings up weird issues. Didn't know it became specific to user, I'll refrain until someone isn't popular.