Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Am Against Feminism

I am against feminism. I am also against equality between women and men. The reason being is we don't know what equality between the sexes is. It seems like we twist the word into equality equals women being successful. We don't care for the fair deal in society. We care for what we're focused on. Which is not equality, It's advantage. Now I realized that even saying I support egalitarianism is a bit dumb. What's the point of calling myself something if it won't advance to the society I desire to exist. It's clear it will advance to anything but that. I support equity. That's all I support. I support a fair deal that benefits both women and men, freedom to it's most fairest point.
Now my opinion on everything that has happened to women:
History is what it is. It was natural selection. So I feel nothing towards the people who had a bad deal because that's just how nature works. We were less advanced. We had no technology up until this point. Birth control is technically still a new discovery if you take in all of history. Human to human. It was the weak vs the strong. No matter how offensive it may be to you but weakness is was causes you to get walked on and women were biologically weak. Now I'm thankful we no longer have to survive but I give my thanks to technology and advancements. Feminism has been tried over and over and over in history. It's nothing new. Women weren't oppressed by men. They were oppressed by their bodies. Oppressed by who they were. More passive, more weak, hindered by pregnancy, and other biological components. Now passiveness is a more accepted trait in a society where we no longer have to be so aggressive. Strength isn't needed to succeed, and women have so many options that I ridicule any of them if they complain about having kids and how it oppresses them.
We live in a new society, clearly women and men have pretty much have equal legal rights. I say almost because women benefit from it more. My main focus now isn't freedom as we already have it but it's a balance of fairness and happiness. Which feminism is not focused on. Fairness isn't a focus but equality (Successful women) is. Happiness isn't a focus but their own version of happiness is their personal happiness than thinking that maybe women come from a diverse thoughts and opinions just like men. They make a huge assumption that to be happy you have to be near to almost exactly like a guy and prove it. Instead of realizing happiness comes from what you as an individual want.
As well as the fact that almost every case they make it is either misleading or they exclude the men who are part of the people who experienced issues in their lives.
Also I am specifically talking about the movements that walk upon the areas of earth that already have given women legal rights and more.
Other countries that are not. I'd say I don't really care for them to an extent when it comes to women's rights mainly because from my own experience it's not a good deal to live in poverty as a human being anyways.
That's my rant.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Pherick · 41-45, M
Just not sure how you can say this statement with a straight face.

Women weren't oppressed by men.
LittleAnonymousChick · 22-25, F
@Pherick You have to understand how I'm thinking. Of course you could say they were oppressed by men but truthfully the main oppressor is who they are. Hence why weak men were oppressed by strong men. The difference is those men were killed.
If men were smaller, more passive, had more disadvantages biologically of course women would oppress men. Those men in a world where they are weaker but needed to continue on the human race would be in the situation they're in because of who they are. In a society this advanced all these things aren't needed to succeed or survive. Therefore we're doing way better.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@LittleAnonymousChick
If men were smaller, more passive, had more disadvantages biologically of course women would oppress men.

Thats something you are assuming, there is no proof that would actually happen.

I don't agree with you though, women could have and did at times fight back against male oppressors. Men are, overall, stronger, had more access to weapons if needed, and had MUCH to lose if women ever took over, they pushed women down and oppressed them in order to maintain control.
LittleAnonymousChick · 22-25, F
@Pherick Again women are already weaker than the weak man and a lot of men who were weak back then are dead.
As well as Examples of this is Hyenas. The males are smaller more passive and weaker. It's basically a matriarchy. It's just life. I don't see why it's such a big deal. Why is it so hard to accept that men are just stronger and the dominant sex. We accept this in other species but in humans we choose to be delusional.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@LittleAnonymousChick Just because some men are physically stronger than some women doesn't make men better or more dominant.

Hyenas are not thinking, rationalizing creatures, so that analogy doesn't work. So to you, if men decided women should be our cleaning, cooking, and breeding slaves, that would be OK. Men are stronger and we should be dominant right?
LittleAnonymousChick · 22-25, F
@Pherick Haha I did say I was for freedom. If you're a man and you want a women who can do all these things find one. You can't force of course because that's illegal in the united states. Men might be the stronger dominant sex but that's all. If all men chose to force women to do something I wouldn't know how to feel about that but I doubt that will ever happen. Guys tend to have more diverse views overall. 90% of men are stronger than 90% of women. Look all I am saying is it's okay for men to be stronger, it's okay to say yes technically they are the dominant sex. Maybe in 5 million years if humans aren't extinct and society hasn't collapsed continuously we could live in a matriarchy. I'm not offended by any idea. I am surprised how uncomfortable and defensive people get when it comes to saying men are stronger and the dominant sex. If you are as an individual prefer a woman who should clean cook and breed. As weird as that maybe to me. Do you. If all men wanted that then us as women are screwed lol. Just like if women were the dominant sex and wanted to force men to do something. You're screwed.
LittleAnonymousChick · 22-25, F
@Pherick If you prefer to not consider humans as animals and above survival and instinct. That's okay. It just seems logical to me.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@LittleAnonymousChick You just seem to want this to be 100% men or 100% women. Why can't be just be equal. Men might be stronger, but that doesn't make us better. Women have alot of advantages over men.

This just seems like something you are really stretching to make an issue of.
LittleAnonymousChick · 22-25, F
@Pherick I don't believe in equality because just as women are as human as men. No one wants true 100% downright equality and we refuse to admit it. We give women all these legal advantages, social advantages, and we label this as equality. There will always be a struggle of power between both sexes. I love men for sure but I also love myself. I don't understand how you perceive me though. I just want a fair look at both genders. A fair acknowledgement of who they are. I don't care for equality because no one wants it. They mess around with it and twist it. It makes me realize I'd rather want a society of freedom and fairness between men and women.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@LittleAnonymousChick LOL You are just saying things you personally think, that doesn't make them true.

No one wants true 100% downright equality and we refuse to admit it.
LittleAnonymousChick · 22-25, F
@Pherick I am saying things based off what everyone supports. Feminism. Which has supported many things that make women and men unequal. Example: Quotas, Divorce Laws, Dividing men and women, instead of supporting giving men and women a fair chance, prefer women having a bigger chance. I could ask the most sexist questions on google in support of women and there are dozens of updated articles on it. Laws based that I gave you examples that do not support equality. People have admitted full well why they voted for hilary. Imagine if I said I voted him donald trump because he is a man.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@LittleAnonymousChick I am sure lots of people voted for trump because he was man.

How is feminism supporting things to make men and women unequal. Lets take a deep look at them.

Quotas? I am sorry I have no idea what you mean here.

Divorce Laws: Divorce laws actually currently favor women, in that regard things are changing but very slowly. Mother's are still almost always considered "better" for the children, but thats slowly changing.
LittleAnonymousChick · 22-25, F
@Pherick Not at all you do realize a lot of these laws have been acted within a decade. Meaning It has gotten worse not better. Quotas is when you're required to hire a certain amount of women no matter how unqualified she is. The fact that feminism is the movement that complained about the standards for vigorous careers to which they lowered it for women? and I'm sure of that as well but you can't say they're sexist when people who support feminism do it for the same reasons. Hence why I say nobody wants 100% equality.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@LittleAnonymousChick There are no laws that say you have to hire women who are unqualified.

This doesn't seem to be going anywhere, you seem to be making up alot of things, and presenting them as fact, when in truth they are not. I am going to call it quits, I don't really have any interesting in debating someone who is making things up or debating their feelings.

Take care.
LittleAnonymousChick · 22-25, F
Quota 1. the proportional share or part of a whole that is due from, due to, or allocated to a person or group.
so if they have to give a women a job because of quotas. Then they are hiring someone less qualified because they have to assign someone a job based on there gender.
LittleAnonymousChick · 22-25, F
@Pherick Why would I make any of that up? I'm sorry if you don't research
Pherick · 41-45, M
@LittleAnonymousChick You actually have just SAID things about all your ideas, you haven't posted any proof or research. So I have no idea why you would make it up.
LittleAnonymousChick · 22-25, F
@Pherick I gave you proof. The defintion. Are you not aware of quotas? What they're for?
Pherick · 41-45, M
@LittleAnonymousChick A definition is not proof. I am aware of what the term quotas means. There are no laws that say you have to hire unqualified women. If you have proof of those, please post it.
LittleAnonymousChick · 22-25, F
@Pherick Lol... quota gives you the proof. Think about it like this. I want 100 employees. The most qualified are 70% male and 30% female. But because of quotas I will have to let go of 20% of those males and replace them with a lesser qualified female.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@LittleAnonymousChick Have you ever hired employees? I have, that is NOT how it works. "Quota" as you are using the term does not exist.
LittleAnonymousChick · 22-25, F
If you don't hire enough women it is used as proof in a lawsuit that you discriminate. It doesn't matter if any qualified women applied for the jobs you hired for or not. It certainly doesn't matter if those women were the most qualified for the job. Only that some women applied and so they should have been hired at an equal number as men or you are a sexist, misogynist, discriminator and must pay the women complaining money.
Pherick · 41-45, M
@LittleAnonymousChick That is just moronic. I am done with you little troll.

Take care.
LittleAnonymousChick · 22-25, F
@Pherick All you can do is insult. Goodbye