I dont get how putting soldiers around public places will stop the attacks, care to explain?
22-25, F
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Pureblossom · 22-25, F
@DeadCowboy: [c=#BF0080]notion is to have a force already deployed, in case need arises[/c]
Yea that makes sense, thanks.
However, that raises concerns of its own are things really that bad, god damn.
Such a pity a country that had no guns in the streets will now do if they do decide to carry out this idea.We all know that will arise some problems too, like people being accidentally shot because they were suspected to be a threat, I can picture it now.
Maybe the soldiers won't be carrying guns?
Yea that makes sense, thanks.
However, that raises concerns of its own are things really that bad, god damn.
Such a pity a country that had no guns in the streets will now do if they do decide to carry out this idea.We all know that will arise some problems too, like people being accidentally shot because they were suspected to be a threat, I can picture it now.
Maybe the soldiers won't be carrying guns?
SW-User
@Pureblossom: I don't know why you'd deploy soldiers without guns; kinda already tried huge networks of cctv and hat didn't seem to help lots. with luck there's something that's been brewing to cause them to deploy. or better yet it's just supposed to reassure everyone that all is under control. although it seems to have the opposite effect for you.
Pureblossom · 22-25, F
@DeadCowboy: Not just me lol.Britain holds firm against issuing guns to officers on the beat, so I can imagine it will be a bit of an adjustment for the people to get used to having guns around them.