Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why do atheists consider the concept of a creator as invalid?

Why is it that atheists find it more plausible that the intricacy - order to detail - of the universe, the earth's fine tuning of life, the human genome - which in itself has, merely for ONE strand of DNA, a building code immensely complex than human language - and the moral law in man's being, all came as nothing other than a result of chance/random happenings but most difficult to accept it was created by a creator/intelligent designer??

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

SW-User

Richard Dawkins admits to Intelligent Design

[media=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BoncJBrrdQ8]

This comment is hidden. Show Comment

Dreammmer · 61-69, M

@Greenbare: of course not, it's all about who you trust.

Pherick · 41-45, M

@GreatLakesGuy: You have got to be kidding me. Richard Dawkins did NO such thing. He put for the idea that an extremely advanced civilization somewhere in the Universe could have "seeded" our planet with life. He did not in any way say "god" did it.

Talk about hearing what you want to hear ...

newjaninev2 · 56-60, F

@GreatLakesGuy: Too funny! Dawkins mentions exogenesis, and the creationists think he's talking about creationism.

SW-User

@newjaninev2: Dawkins admits to intelligent design. He does not say it is God rather he talks about some sort of alien race. Live long and prosper.

Pherick · 41-45, M

@GreatLakesGuy: He doesn't "admit" to anything.. dear god. People who watch this and take away "Dawkins admits to intelligent design" are dense. Listening comprehension ... learn it!