Top | Newest First | Oldest First
SW-User
it doesn't really seem like a very effective use of force.
View 1 more replies »
UndeadPrivateer · 31-35, M
@DeadCowboy: My thoughts exactly.
SW-User
@XamadtheFirst: but trump had virtually nothing to do with deciding to deploy it.
SW-User
@UndeadPrivateer: about $200k to kill 36 isis people. plus the cost to fly it there.
Nefarious · 26-30, M
I just want to know why they didn't use a bunker buster. It would have been way more effective at the objective: destroying underground targets. The MOAB just booms and burns.
GohantheThird · M
It's not like Republicans have that many wins in the legislative branch, so they have to take this one. Hopefully it won't start a war.
SteelHands · 61-69, M
Sometimes people need to be reminded. Hope we don't need to drop a few hundred more.
Socialclutz · 36-40, M
Fewer isis jack asses in the world? What's there to complain about?
FuriousSam · 26-30, M
Pretty effective in MW3 if you play the Infected mode. lol
MikefromEP · 51-55, M
Glad I wasn't anywhere near that 20,000 pound bomb