Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Do you think there should be silence surrounding the banning of certain celebrities?

Example... This Tate guy!
He's under investigation for serious crimes, posted really disgusting content...
Should accounts of people like this be removed with no announcements?

Should we let the police do their jobs and any convictions be known via press release only?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

REMsleep · 41-45, F

Private companies have the right to ban whomever they want. We don't have free speech within private companies.

The tricky thing with Tate is that he himself doesn't monetize his content. He has no Instagram channel or Facebook or Youtube. All of his content is spread organically by people who want to see it. So banning his content won't change anything. People will still post interviews and reactions from him and the root of whatever problem exsists will still be there. In fact banning his content will make him into a matyr or hero.

Mellowgirl · 31-35, F

@REMsleep I personally think people like this should be silenced and disappear silently. Yes once convinced it's important it's reported but all this posting and reposting of his senseless harmful content is unnecessary.
He was an example as he's the latest addition.
But even with the other names like weinstein and spacey etc. Theres just too much talk about it.
We should know once they're convicted.
If they really need to appeal to the public to come forward then that's different but all this digging that non professionals do is really unnecessary!