This post may contain Mildly Adult content.
Mildly AdultFun
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Media loves to portray anti vaxxers (anti test subjects) as white conservative conspiracy theorists...

I find that ironic considering 13% of African Americans have been vaccinated and majority still refuse to get vaccinated. And over 50% of caucasians have been vaccinated

What happened to liberating the black voices and all of the black voices who have negative things to say about the vaccine and don’t want it. Liberating black voices is what liberal media does to get political leverage for whatever the personal agenda is at the time. Liberal media WOULD never liberate a black conservative. They only liberate the black voices that agree with the agenda they are pushing🤧

I was having this conversation with my friend from work. And I quite literally said “why is it that the media likes to portray the people who don’t want to get the vaccine as white republican conspiracy theorists when in reality 13% of black people ate vaccinated and 50 something percent of white people are vaccinated.”

And she said “it’s funny isn’t it”

And I said “out of curiosity why don’t you want to get vaccinated?”

And she said “because you heard about all them people who died and got sick from it and it doesn’t get reported. And people die and talk about it on social media and get banned. And it doesn’t help that they started the vaccines in Africa.”

I hope this post makes someone’s blood boil. And I hope it makes the ones who have sense think. And someone will call me a liar like the libtards on this site love to call people liars for saying something they don’t agree with. It must be pitiful living so ignorantly. How do they ever expect to learn anything if they shut down whatever information that comes at them that is uncomfortable? Well that’s because they don’t learn. 🤷🏼‍♀️

You don’t learn anything by shutting out any kind of information simply because you don’t like it. I used to be a libtard too. I used to hate trump too because I never actually did any personal research and only saw the horrific things the media would say about him. 🥴

Why do you think so many young people are liberals and older folks are conservative..... that’s because they grew up.... along with their idealisms
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Northwest · M
[quote]Media loves to portray anti vaxxers (anti test subjects) as white conservative conspiracy theorists[/quote]

1. Getting vaccinated and being a test subject are two different things.

2. Is mainstream media portraying anti-vaxers as exclusively white conservative conspiracy theorists?

[quote]And it doesn’t help that they started the vaccines in Africa[/quote]

What does this mean? Are you saying that Covid vaccination started in Africa? Or vaccination in general started in Africa?
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
@Northwest

“Getting vaccinated and being a test subject are two different things”

Yes, they are in a general sense. Being vaccinated by an untested vaccine makes you a test subject 🥴
Northwest · M
@DeluxedEdition [quote]Being vaccinated by an untested vaccine makes you a test subject[/quote]

Curiously enough all Covid vaccines went through 3 phases of testing each, and data from these tests went through rigorous review by the appropriate agencies.

The first test shots were administered in Seattle in March, 2020, so this group of people were test subjects.

the first vaccine shot was done on December 14, 2020, to a person in a risk group (65+) and the vaccine was given an emergency use authorization by the FDA.
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
@Northwest vaccination testing minimum time frame is about a decade.......

Three months isn’t a safe nor reasonable time frame to consider testing a vaccine on a population.

The fda is well aware of this which is why that authorization would have been needed in the first place......... 😐
Northwest · M
@DeluxedEdition [quote]vaccination testing minimum time frame is about a decade. Three months isn’t a safe nor reasonable time frame to consider testing a vaccine on a population. The fda is well aware of this which is why that authorization would have been needed in the first place[/quote]

Vaccines normally go through the following stages:

1. Exploratory Stage. This stage involves basic laboratory research and often lasts 2-4 years.

2. Pre-Clinical Stage. Pre-clinical studies use tissue-culture or cell-culture systems and animal testing to assess the safety of the candidate vaccine and its immunogenicity.

3. IND Application. A sponsor, usually a private company, submits an application for an Investigational New Drug (IND) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

4. Phase I Vaccine Trials. This first attempt to assess the candidate vaccine in humans involves a small group of adults, usually between 20-80 subjects.

5. Phase II Vaccine Trials. A larger group of several hundred individuals participates in Phase II testing.

6. Phase III Vaccine Trials. Successful Phase II candidate vaccines move on to larger trials, involving thousands to tens of thousands of people.

#1 and #2 phases had already been conducted prior to 2019. mRNA vaccines are not business as usual, and the technique had been under development since 2011, using other Corona viruses.

#3 phase for mRNA was attempted on multiple occasions prior to 2019, for other Corona viruses, but the outbreaks died out, so they did not have enough test subjects.

Stages 4 through 6 were properly conducted and stage 6 had several times the number of test subjects than any previous standard vaccines.

The FDA granted emergency use, as it was confident of the test results, given the massive number of test subjects.

As of today, nearly 4 billion shots have been given, with adverse affects lower than any other vaccine in history.
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
@Northwest and the duration of those stages last over a course of years even decades

AIDS was first identified in 1984 and there still isn’t a cure or vaccination but we were able to create a vaccine for a biogenetically altered virus that surfaced in less than a year.......

who are you trying to bullshit? Me or you😐 if you’re scared just say that. I’m scared too. We are basically being held hostage by our own government for a virus they created with our tax money. That’s fucking terrifying. What’s even more terrifying is people like you giving them the power to do so

But being willingly ignorant and choosing not to see the elephant in the room when it’s obviously there is dangerous and WONT make it go away nor will it make whatever the media is saying true
Northwest · M
@DeluxedEdition [quote]and the duration of those stages last over a course of years even decades
[/quote]

Possibly, but the math adds up. The initial mRNA exploratory stage started in 1987-1988.

[quote]AIDS was first identified in 1984 and there still isn’t a cure or vaccination but we were able to create a vaccine for a [b]biogenetically[/b] altered virus that surfaced in less than a year.......[/quote]

biogenetically? Looks like you just invented an adjective here. AIDS is caused by the HIV virus, first isolated in 1983 at the Pasteur Institute. You may not know it, but HIV is not the same as SARS--CoV-2, which cause Covid-19. We also don't have a vaccine for the common cold. So what?

[quote]who are you trying to bullshit? Me or you😐 if you’re scared just say that. I’m scared too. We are basically being held hostage by our own government for a virus they created with our tax money. That’s fucking terrifying. What’s even more terrifying is people like you giving them the power to do so[/quote]

I am simply stating facts. How is this related to anything I said? Or to the vaccine for that matter. Speaking of bullshit, I'm sure this: [b][i][u]for a virus they created with our tax money[/u][/i][/b] qualifies as bullshit.

[quote]But being willingly ignorant and choosing not to see the elephant in the room when it’s obviously there is dangerous and WONT make it go away nor will it make whatever the media is saying true[/quote]

Speaking of media, you still have not identified the supposed media that's exclusively portraying anti-vaxers as white supremacists.
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
@Northwest I’m not going back and forth with you anymore. There’s nothing left to repeat or say if you don’t want to see the truth right in front of you that’s your problem. not mine🤷🏼‍♀️
Northwest · M
@DeluxedEdition [quote]I’m not going back and forth with you anymore. There’s nothing left to repeat or say if you don’t want to see the truth right in front of you that’s your problem. not mine[/quote]

And yet, you present no facts, simply ad hominem attacks and inflammatory statements.
DeluxedEdition · 26-30, F
@Northwest [quote]And yet, you present no facts, simply ad hominem attacks and inflammatory statements.[/quote]

the irony is overwhelming with this one
Northwest · M
@DeluxedEdition [quote]the irony is overwhelming with this one
[/quote]

For you? I'm sure. Other than random attacks, did you present any facts?