Some of these fires in the West are arson.

@JAYS21 Great argumentation skills. Now get back to your basement.

@JAYS21 Lighting a match in a forest, normally, doesn't burn an entire country. Or as a species we wouldn't have come as far.

So simple even you might understand.

@JAYS21 Don't project. I have no use for retards like yourself. In the real sense of the term, because you're at least 500 years late on this world if you retain antiscientific positions in 2020.

@Elessar They should have been maintained, fire stops maintained and new ones created, debris fuel removed and recycled, forestry managed, etc. just a proven fact. Laws going back to 70’s mandated this to stop.

This nefarious scheme is to eradicate populations from the coasts and declare a natural habitat to eventually be bought up and controlled by the very elite. Much has been written on this subject.

Arson is a huge proponent to these fires. Most news is being censored but is there to find. I see it everyday,Yesterday, I was blocked because people cannot see the truth. It’s a shame. I saw a video days ago of the Governor on site smiling and not able to control his enthusiasm for the fires. It’s so obvious and will spread east. Go ahead rejoice in this destruction. Shameful.

@Oster1 The #1 fire stopper, also historically, has always been and will always be rain. If we've come to the point that in an entire season it rains like once, fires are purely a natural consequence, no matter who or what ignites them.

Arsonists, as I said, have always existed and will always exist. In history, there were potentially more forests than now, less policing, and more actors interested in burning them (if starting a forest fire was enough to burn down an enemy nation, many of them far smaller than California, you can bet they would've tried it).

So yeah, it doesn't matter much if it a match, a lighter, a lightning or the hot exhaust of a car starting a fire, the problem is they shouldn't spread at that rate and in such vast areas.

Videos taken out of context (or potentially generated with stuff like reface.ai) anyway aren't "proof" for anything. It isn't necessarily censorship, but simply the fact that on the internet even people who think the Earth is a flat disk forge their "evidence".

@JAYS21 Link a peer reviewed paper stating that the data doesn't support the projections and that climate change isn't anthropogenic or factual. I challenge you. If you know anything about science you'll realise you're in bad faith.

@JAYS21 Peer review is what keep morons like yourself out of real science. In fact you guys rely on youtubers, typically, lmao