@
Mamapolo2016 Here are my follow ups
Limited period when two cops are partners
Hadn't considered this to be problematic. If there are no complaints about a team, why break them up?
Required to live in the city limits where they serve
I like this. Police should be members of the community they serve.
Frequent psych testing
Well, I would say counseling as a normal thing. Maybe it's the same thing?
Police oversight bodies that are not part of the police department, and include ordinary citizens
This exists in Seattle. I think it's good, but it's relatively new. Its effectiveness isn't known yet.
Complaints and reprimands reviewed by that separate body
Agreed
Better pay for cops and discouragement from moonlighting
Cops need a proper sustainable wage. Camden added more police, but lowered the high end pay. This should be about appropriate pay, depending on what they do. (not all police are the same)
Body cams for every cop on duty and their vehicles, reviewed frequently (even without a reported incident or complaint) to monitor their interaction with citizens.
This is hard and feels Big Brother-ish. The ACLU has requested that Seattle NOT have cameras on all the time, unless there's an interaction. (I can't stand the ACLU honestly).
I don't know how to wrap my head around something for this that makes sense.
Legalize drugs
agreed
Financial oversight of some kind to identify graft income
If we do this for police, we need it for politicians as well.
Continuing education on relations with the public and up-to-date procedures.
agreed
Meticulous selection and supervision of training officers.
To me, this already exists. What we need are zero-tolerance policies for cops that are clearly not cut out for supporting the community.