In a world with no corruption which political system would you want to rule your country?
i say we need a king! monarchs!
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Adaydreambeliever · 56-60, F
LOL good question but I'd say, in a world with no corruption it wouldn't matter.. they'd all be fine! I do see your point that we would assume that a monarch would be more into protecting the whole populace.. tho it hasn't always proven to be the case.
We have a queen, she's ok.. but then again she doesn't actually have ANY power beyond her words.. many people don't understand that
We have a queen, she's ok.. but then again she doesn't actually have ANY power beyond her words.. many people don't understand that
View 2 more replies »
popmol · 22-25, M
@Adaydreambeliever mmh i think its kinda unfair, if a king or president does something for the greater good of all his people even if rich or majority doesn't see it he can still do it. but a democracy cna destroy itself by sheer stupidity!
popmol · 22-25, M
@Adaydreambeliever thats true xD but like i said this idea is only in a perfect world with no corruption xD in any other case i gladly have a democracy :)
maturedragon · 26-30, M
popmol · 22-25, M
@maturedragon yes like i always say a good king is better then a good democracy!
sunrisehawk · 61-69, M
A constitutional republic with no corruption would mean no one would "rule" just hold the reigns of governmental power temporarily.
Monarchy's have proven themselves a failure as hereditary positions always end up with some incompetent in charge and only violence to resort to.
Monarchy's have proven themselves a failure as hereditary positions always end up with some incompetent in charge and only violence to resort to.
popmol · 22-25, M
@sunrisehawkwell presidential then :p i just mean a sole ruler xD
SampledVinyl · 41-45, F
popmol · 22-25, M
@SampledVinyl whut?
Reflection2 · 41-45, M
