This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Bushmanoz · 56-60, M
Just you, because you are dumbtarded
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@Bushmanoz It is english. Just 'cause you dont understand english with it's above simpleton-used don't make it less english.
But I can translate for you: ARGUMENTS now, or you are what you called me.
A projection of what you said would be you trying to blame others for the flaws in your personality or the flaws in your mind.
I am an intelligent person, don't test me, last time you got mashed.
But I can translate for you: ARGUMENTS now, or you are what you called me.
A projection of what you said would be you trying to blame others for the flaws in your personality or the flaws in your mind.
I am an intelligent person, don't test me, last time you got mashed.
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@Bushmanoz Well, you do understand that you adapt to what your'e talking to.
If I talk to some rude loser online who lack manners, of course that person will see a more defensive side of me. Puting that side up, SCREAMING in agony from reading pure gibberish would be a possibility.
Email to some one would most likely be a more important individual to you.
And as I only talk to intelligent people who respect their fellow humans unless it's called for to not, I'd see no use of "SCREAMING".
But if you meet the rude drunkt that insults people for no reason, you'll now give him your best side. You'd most likely ignore him, so... soon block, yes.
If I talk to some rude loser online who lack manners, of course that person will see a more defensive side of me. Puting that side up, SCREAMING in agony from reading pure gibberish would be a possibility.
Email to some one would most likely be a more important individual to you.
And as I only talk to intelligent people who respect their fellow humans unless it's called for to not, I'd see no use of "SCREAMING".
But if you meet the rude drunkt that insults people for no reason, you'll now give him your best side. You'd most likely ignore him, so... soon block, yes.
This message was deleted by its author.
Bushmanoz · 56-60, M
@NiceShoes oh..well that pic totally changed everything..lol. Mate, I have one more question. You said that [quote]If I talk to some rude loser online who lack manners, of course that person will see a more defensive side of me. Puting that side up, SCREAMING in agony from reading pure gibberish would be a possibility.[/quote] But you started this very post Caps locking words, and that was with zero replies
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@Bushmanoz I was comparing my posts to you with en email or letter.
You asked about why I was screaming in the replies.
The quetsion is about something that is annoying, therefor SCREAMING would be legit?
Do you understand why it's even annoying when people heart every single reply?
Do you see how it ruins the very function itself?
You asked about why I was screaming in the replies.
The quetsion is about something that is annoying, therefor SCREAMING would be legit?
Do you understand why it's even annoying when people heart every single reply?
Do you see how it ruins the very function itself?
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@Bushmanoz "In my mind"? The function is not subjective, it's an objective fact.
I don't overthink. A lot of users here heart every single post in every question.
If you don't see how the the heart function is for LIKES, when it's used to like things in every mainstream media app there is, maybe you'll not understand the explaination.
I mean, you missed the fact that the heart-function is for likes?
You even type it out "...don't actually like every reply"?. So you talk about how it's used while you say you don't understand how it's used or qustioning it at least when you ask me about it?
This is annoying to me.
If you ask me if I really got what the likes are used, and at the same time using arguments where you question things I said that'd indirectly tell you that I do know what the usage of the likes are for, you need to find a way to see your own confusion.
I don't overthink. A lot of users here heart every single post in every question.
If you don't see how the the heart function is for LIKES, when it's used to like things in every mainstream media app there is, maybe you'll not understand the explaination.
I mean, you missed the fact that the heart-function is for likes?
You even type it out "...don't actually like every reply"?. So you talk about how it's used while you say you don't understand how it's used or qustioning it at least when you ask me about it?
This is annoying to me.
If you ask me if I really got what the likes are used, and at the same time using arguments where you question things I said that'd indirectly tell you that I do know what the usage of the likes are for, you need to find a way to see your own confusion.
Bushmanoz · 56-60, M
@NiceShoes Your thoughts on the heart button is just an opinion, have you spoken to the owners of the site? I have, I think you will find it is not there for someone to simply show they like a post, or that they made a good point, it's to create a sense of community and be supportive..it kinda boils down to the name of the site..it's not called Debate Club, but Similar Worlds, where people can come and get support from things they are going through. People Don't "heart" a post about someone who suffered abuse to say "I like that post" but to show empathy and support..knucklehead. Maybe open your mind a bit and you'll learn something rather than trying to force your opinions on everyone else. Also mate, I really struggle to read some of your posts. The grammar is poor and I think you are in such a hurry to send a reply that you don't notice. It's why I have asked you several times if English is not your native language. I seriously want to know, and then I know not to be as critical when deciphering your reply
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@Bushmanoz The heart button has a set function. That is not an opinion, that's an objective fact. I am no "knucklehead", you used an example now that I didn't complain about, you baked that into the context your self, I never even talk about it!
So don't just PUT THINGS RANDOM into the context that I did not SAY, to then INSULT ME FOR YOUR ADDED TEXT TO THE CONVO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OK?!?! THAT'S VERY STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Apologize for doing that or I will block you.
That was the LOWEST THING EVER!!
You actually do something stupid, something that is irrational, something that is even delusional, as YOU ADD YOUR STORY to my context, then you complain about something I never said but YOU added, and you insult me for it!!! wtfg?!?!?!
APOLOGIZE OR BLOCK!! YOU'VE GONE TOO FAR!!!!!!!!!!!!
DON'T EVER TRY OUT A GENIUS LIKE ME WHEN YOU MIGHT BE A 2 DIGIT IQ-PERSON!!!!!!!
So don't just PUT THINGS RANDOM into the context that I did not SAY, to then INSULT ME FOR YOUR ADDED TEXT TO THE CONVO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OK?!?! THAT'S VERY STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Apologize for doing that or I will block you.
That was the LOWEST THING EVER!!
You actually do something stupid, something that is irrational, something that is even delusional, as YOU ADD YOUR STORY to my context, then you complain about something I never said but YOU added, and you insult me for it!!! wtfg?!?!?!
APOLOGIZE OR BLOCK!! YOU'VE GONE TOO FAR!!!!!!!!!!!!
DON'T EVER TRY OUT A GENIUS LIKE ME WHEN YOU MIGHT BE A 2 DIGIT IQ-PERSON!!!!!!!
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
This message was deleted by its author.