If you saw a random pregnant lady drinking a bottle of vodka, what would you do?

What about the baby?

@MeganFox2016: If she were in public, forcing a newborn baby to drink vodka, yeah, then the police could get involved. It's a slippery slope, legally regulating someone's behavior just because they are pregnant. Understand, I have my own thoughts about it, but we're speaking from a strictly legal standpoint.

@bijouxbroussard: You're gonna let it be just because it's legal?

@MeganFox2016: And let me repeat:

1) I'm not the police.
2) I have my own thoughts about it.
3) Yes. I have no desire to be sued.

@bijouxbroussard: I know what you mean, but you won't be sued if it's what the police do. Now, what if the police weren't there? Would you stop her?

@MeganFox2016: You don't get it. It's NOT illegal. And yes you can absolutely be sued for accosting a stranger for doing something just because you think it's wrong. You can save a living, breathing child but you don't have the right to touch a pregnant woman. Moreover we don't lock women up for not taking care of their bodies while pregnant.

Now, I personally believe that since a woman can legally terminate any pregnancy she doesn't want, she has a moral (note, not legal) obligation to protect any pregnancy she plans to keep. But that is my personal belief and the law would not be on my side if I tried to "stop" a total stranger from drinking. Have I explained this enough, now ?

@bijouxbroussard: Hmmmm I see, it's all about the law...But, if you could, would you stop her?

@MeganFox2016: NO.

@bijouxbroussard: Ah...Well, that's all I need to know, a simple NO says everything

@MeganFox2016: You'll note that my initial reply to "what would you do" was "Nothing." The rest was extraneous information.

@bijouxbroussard: You'll note that my "what would you do" and your "Nothing" were before I "abandoned" the law. Your "NO" is different

@MeganFox2016: Not really. Either way it's a negative.

@bijouxbroussard: Oh it's different alright and it's more negative