Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Why Michael Jackson is glorified as a star even if we know that he was a child molester?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Michael Jackson
Michael Jackson (1958-2009) was a famous singer and entertainer. Between 1993 and 1994 and separately between 2004 and 2005, Jackson was investigated by California law enforcement agencies for possible child molestation. [b][c=#BF0000]He was acquitted of all such [/c][/b]charges.
[b]
[/b]Source: FBI
RylanTheHusker · 26-30, M
A lot of celebrities can get away with almost anything. @MarmeeMarch
Warda · 31-35, F
@RylanTheHusker R kelly as an example
@RylanTheHusker You do know what An investigation means do you?
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@MarmeeMarch Do you defend Hilary Clinton in the same manner? After all, she wasn't convicted of anything either.
Subsumedpat · 36-40, M
@MarmeeMarch So was OJ Simpson but that does not mean he is innocent.
@Subsumedpat Prove to me that Michael Jackson was guilty
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@MarmeeMarch Nah, don't change the subject.

Do you defend Hillary Clinton in the same manner? After all, she wasn't convicted either.

Why the contradiction? There is plenty of evidence available either way, why do you claim Jackson is innocent, but turn around and assume Clinton's guilt?
@SumKindaMunster Does the word investigation by authorities have any meaning to you?so let me test my understanding if you were investigated and found that there was no evidence against you Would you keep pushing the subject------- yeah I thought so
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@MarmeeMarch What an utterly stupid and irrelevant reply. This is why people despise Trump supporters. Idiots like you give them all the ammunition they need to justify their biases.
@SumKindaMunster You could Call it stupid all you want its true Michael Jackson has never been proven to be a child molester even though you want him to be
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@MarmeeMarch Oh please, my comments have nothing to do with Jackson and everything to do with your rank hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance.

I ask the question a 3rd time:

Do you defend Hillary Clinton in the same manner? After all, she wasn't convicted either.

Why the contradiction? There is plenty of evidence available either way, why do you claim Jackson is innocent, but turn around and assume Clinton's guilt?

I know you understand the questions.

The fact that you continue to reply with non sequitors only serves to demonstrate you are aware of your hypocrisy, don't want to admit it, and think I am going to be distracted or discouraged by your nonsense.

That won't happen.
@SumKindaMunster We are not talking about Hillary Clinton is this a Hillary Clinton post ?
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@MarmeeMarch No we are not. What's your answer to my questions?
@SumKindaMunster Sorry try again I'm not gonna fall for your stupid little asshole trap we are talking about Michael Jackson when we talk about Hillary Clinton you could show your nasty face

Kind of pisses you off that I am not answering a question so you can build on it I love it
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@MarmeeMarch I'm not mad at all. I was curious how you would justify something like that in your mind, and I have learned that you won't because it makes you uncomfortable.

I'm not bothered by your silly nonsense in the least. That says more about you than me, quite frankly.
@SumKindaMunster Apparently you don't know what this post is all about you want to turn it into something that you want to argue and I'm not falling for it you see I'm inside your mind there's nothing you can do about it
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@MarmeeMarch I know what the post is about. I responded to it in another comment. I was asking you to explain/justify your hypocrisy on this and you have responded very aggressively and nonsensically.

I have no feelings about that, just noting your behavior.
@SumKindaMunster All right then, note away
@SumKindaMunster Better yet why don't you just go away
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@MarmeeMarch I will go away if you answer the questions I asked.
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@MarmeeMarch 🤷‍♂️
@SumKindaMunster OK OK OK yes I would defend Hillary Clinton as much as I dislike her the law is the law Anymore stupid ass questions
SumKindaMunster · 51-55, M
@MarmeeMarch Ok. Thank you. So to reiterate, you believe both Michael Jackson and Hillary Clinton are innocent because they were never convicted in a court of law for their alleged crimes.

Interesting. At least there is some consistency there.
@SumKindaMunster Sure why not I'm not a little baby that screams foul play I abide by what a judge or a court of law decides