Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Should eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth be in the constitution?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

MaryJanine · 61-69, F

No, definitely NOT. We have enough unplanned bloodshed without mutilation added to the mix,

popmol · 22-25, M