Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Should eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth be in the constitution?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Wouldn't be much point. By the time the lawyers and judges got done haggling over was it really that person’s eye? and was ownership of the tooth legally established? - the DA would have already settled a plea deal to yank out one of the perpetrator’s eyelashes.
popmol · 22-25, M
@Mamapolo2016 lol xD