Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Should eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth be in the constitution?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Axelerator · 26-30, M

No i wouldn't say so, that would be devolving into older more primal ways. Nor is the current way of things good either.

popmol · 22-25, M

@Axelerator interesting :)