Who has changed their mind about OJ Simpson ?

@SW-User No he isn't guilty

@TJNewton He's not guilty in the eyes of the law because a jury acquitted him. The question was obviously asking for personal opinions.

@SW-User when you examine the evidence you should see who really did it and the guilty person is his son OJ is innocent

@TJNewton You're entitled to your opinion. I don't agree.

@SW-User It's not an opinion it's fact

@TJNewton So, his son was charged with the murders and found guilty?

@SW-User No the stupid dumb police force overlooked the fact that there was bloodstained footprints all over the murder scene which matched the shoes of his son and no OJ did not put them there also a few days prior he had a massive argument with the woman and was heard to say i'll kill you

@TJNewton 🙄 What conspiracy theorist wrote that? Never mind. I don't care.

@SW-User Ok fine 👍️

@TJNewton No. The shoes were his. There's photographic that he owned those shoes.

@Ynotisay The shoes wasn't his size they belonged to his son

@TJNewton Size 12 Bruno Magli. The same size found at the scene. The same shoes a photo showed him wearing. Only 200 pairs made and sold at five retailers. One of the retailers where Simpson bought a lot of stuff.

I lived in L.A. at the time. The riot was still fresh. This verdict was retribution by a jury of almost all black people. You should check out some of the follow up interviews with the jurors.

He killed those people. And I think you know that. Why you'd defend him is your call.

@Ynotisay You have your verdict i have mine end of story

@TJNewton https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2016/06/02/photos-sent-oj-simpson-spiraling/84911596/

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/06/20/us/simpson-s-shoe-size-fits-bloody-prints-left-crime-scene-fbi-expert-says.html



@Ynotisay He's based his "fact" on one or more of the many conspiracy theory books written after the trial.