Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Really?
SW-User
@LostSoul22 really 😌
@SW-User Very neat!
Theseus · 46-50, M
Kinda puts the kibosh on the whole overpop argument.
...But then you need a land mass five times that size to grow enough food to feed 'em.
...But then you need a land mass five times that size to grow enough food to feed 'em.
SW-User
@Theseus that and a whole lot of other stuff too - yeah :)
Mugin16 · 46-50, M
😲
wintersecret · 41-45, M
the area in orange or the area in white :D
SW-User
@wintersecret the one in orange of course 😅
wintersecret · 41-45, M
@SW-User LMAO. Mumbai itself is more populated
SW-User
@wintersecret its not about population of the area but compressing the population in India to that kind of efficiency
S2dio57 · M
India ...
no offense but-
🤦🏼♂️ No thanks ...
no offense but-
🤦🏼♂️ No thanks ...
SW-User
@S2dio57 aww just because its dense doesn't mean its bad - it's nice in its own way :)
SW-User
@S2dio57 to each their own 😌
Deadcutie · 18-21, F
That place is a shithole from what I hear
SW-User
@Deadcutie hardly not - it's a lil quick to assume a place to be a shit hole before visiting it don't you think?
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
NeoNeo · 41-45, M
We'd be living very close then.
SW-User
@NeoNeo pretty much <3
SW-User
Hmm. What's your point?
SW-User
@SW-User population density is an interesting thing - it also shows how metropolises handle huge populations ^^
mysteriouslion · 31-35, M
I would die because of suffocation