Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Hey any cute woman in here?

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
MrsKatherineArch · 41-45, F
Nope, we are all ugly old hags. Sorry
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@MrsKatherineArch i dont think you can talk for all women here
MrsKatherineArch · 41-45, F
@NiceShoes Sarcasm is lost on you, isn’t it?
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@MrsKatherineArch You don't get it, you can't use sarcasm if you don't know how to apply it..
nevermind your' too stupid..
@NiceShoes that was really rude.
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@VeronicaJane She was rude first.
@NiceShoes LOL. IDK, there are some who might think your question was rude in the first place. 😂
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@VeronicaJane Ok? Then tell me HOW it was rude, as it was not rude!!!
MrsKatherineArch · 41-45, F
I’m too stupid, but you aren’t capable of understanding sarcasm.
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@MrsKatherineArch I am. You are wrong.
Let's argue then.
Why arey ou saying i don't understand sarcasm?
Do you mean that if I understand that you try to talk for all women, and try to use sarcasm, that stll dont work?
'cause you dont know what all women here looks like?
and to use that sarcasm in a proper way you had to know that?
Is that what you don't get?
MrsKatherineArch · 41-45, F
@NiceShoes I’m don’t with this conversation because you are looking for a fight. Asking a blanket question like you did is going to get you silly answers.

I hope you eventually grow a sense of humor. Bye now
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@MrsKatherineArch I have a good sense of humor that's why I reacted like this. You're not funny.
@NiceShoes you didn't say 'any ladies', but 'cute women'.

If they don't meet your idea of 'cute', then not worth your time.

Sort of like a woman walking into a room, looking around, seeing you but ignoring you and walking right by you. Which would also be rude.
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@VeronicaJane You add things here.. that I didn't say. Then you use the things you made up for reasons to get mad?
How weird.

Let me try doing the same thing to you!

You quetsioned what I said, and therefor you want me killed!
YOU'RE A FUCKIGN MURDED I'LL REPORT YOU TO THE PIOLICE!!!!!
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@VeronicaJane Do you understand that you can't ADD things to what ppl say and then say it's rude cause you react on the things you MADE UP in your HEAD that made it rude?!?!?
@NiceShoes nice. Who said I was mad?
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@VeronicaJane You still need to tell me how my quetsion was rude, you've not donethat yet.
You just said somethign that don't make sense.
how was i rude?
@NiceShoes nope, it was a shallow, superficial question in the first place.

Are you getting the responses you were looking for?

If you have really been rejected by hundreds of women like you said elsewhere in this, I may have an idea why. 😂
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@VeronicaJane Being shallow is not the same as being rude.
You said I was rude, how was I rude?

I don't get rejected, are you delusional?
@NiceShoes i am sure in your mind you do not get rejected.

You are right. GASP! I was going back and forth between posts. The hundreds of rejections was actually in tbe other post. You and him are either quite a pair, or same person with two accounts and same attitude.

Its all perception. You don't think you were rude. Apparently we are perceiving you as rude, defensive and argumentative.

Don't worry. Apparently you are fine and its the rest of us with the issue.

Bye bye.
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@VeronicaJane Rejection is objective. If you attract you don't reject.
Very simple.
It's not an "in your mind" thing. You seem confused about what's subjective and objective.

Rejection is not when some one fights with you on this site. Rejection is when a girl don't want you 'cause of what you look like.
You seem very stupid the way you argue, please stop.

Yeah, no arguments.
I was never rude but you were.
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@VeronicaJane An issue is when some one claims that a person is rude, then she has no proof for this. So you're the issue in this case.