This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
iQuit · F
😋your powers will Always have their kryptonite 😂
iQuit · F
@NiceShoes lol... it's simple to see your assumption of right and wrong has lead you astray into a further contradictory ideal
which none of this had to lead on to... but as you feel compelled to go on digging deeper
then, go on as you must 🤣it's truly endearing to see how much effort this seems to have lead you to
which none of this had to lead on to... but as you feel compelled to go on digging deeper
then, go on as you must 🤣it's truly endearing to see how much effort this seems to have lead you to
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@iQuit I assumed nothing. What did I assume, ACCORDING TO YOU?
You ignoring when you're wrong, then you do the same thing again.
Or not, this was not even an assumption that you got wrong,.
This was you telling me I assumed something, when I did not.
This was you misunderstanding english.
You ignoring when you're wrong, then you do the same thing again.
Or not, this was not even an assumption that you got wrong,.
This was you telling me I assumed something, when I did not.
This was you misunderstanding english.
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@iQuit So you can't just type what you think was an assumption 'cause I used caps-locks for two words?
Yeah that IS an idiocy.
I could ask you how the letters used to type a text would stop you from replying, but I feel you keep typing NON-ANSWERS.
I gave you a fair chance.
So, the case: You state random things based on insanity and when you get confronted you make up weak excuses.
If you don't want that to be a closed case, tell me what you ASSUMED was an assumption from me. It was no assumption made in the messages you referred to.
Yeah that IS an idiocy.
I could ask you how the letters used to type a text would stop you from replying, but I feel you keep typing NON-ANSWERS.
I gave you a fair chance.
So, the case: You state random things based on insanity and when you get confronted you make up weak excuses.
If you don't want that to be a closed case, tell me what you ASSUMED was an assumption from me. It was no assumption made in the messages you referred to.
NiceShoes · 31-35, M
@iQuit Ok. I will now argue like you do:
Oh, you're saying that you are a bird and you live in a house made out of sticks?
That's what you said in your last reply?
You're INSANE!
And hey, you can't go back now!
I say you typed this, and if you QUESTION it... it would be "time lost"?
Now, let's get back to REALITY!
The only reason I'm asking you to tell me what you ASSUME was an assumption from my side, is 'casue your'e wrong.
I never assumed anything.
So when you state something as a fact and are wrong, you get called out for it.
If your reaction to that is "you can't go back then it's lost time", your whole first reply go agaimst the "can't go back argument".
You just keep losing more and more.
You can't win.
You seem very confused. Please stop.
Oh, you're saying that you are a bird and you live in a house made out of sticks?
That's what you said in your last reply?
You're INSANE!
And hey, you can't go back now!
I say you typed this, and if you QUESTION it... it would be "time lost"?
Now, let's get back to REALITY!
The only reason I'm asking you to tell me what you ASSUME was an assumption from my side, is 'casue your'e wrong.
I never assumed anything.
So when you state something as a fact and are wrong, you get called out for it.
If your reaction to that is "you can't go back then it's lost time", your whole first reply go agaimst the "can't go back argument".
You just keep losing more and more.
You can't win.
You seem very confused. Please stop.