Controversial or true?
I am of the belief that anyone who does this should receive the automatic death sentence and it should be carried out immediately.
I am of the belief that anyone who does this should receive the automatic death sentence and it should be carried out immediately.
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
LUVELACE · T
A bullet is far to quick for that sort of scum,personally a very large mirror,5/6ft square,knee them down facing the mirror,nail their feet to the floor with rail spikes,then drop a Louisville slugger out take a few step back,strike a let the bastards see his last vision his own skull explode like an melon,then burn what’s left of the fucker,and send his family the clean up bill.
Sicarium · 46-50, M
No, there's been way too many wrongful convictions that were later overturned to get rid of the appeals process for any crime.
View 11 more replies »
L33TH4X0R · 41-45, M
@Sicarium
all you can do is go on about the horrors of child molestation, which won't solve anything.
...wich is enough for a normal sane person. Nobody normal would condone the abuse of a child and then think that the person has any right left to live. Deviants like these are "incurable" meaning they will always be a danger to society. Killing them is the most humane thing we can do as it would be inhumane to lock them away forever...which is another possibility and then they could have all the god damn appeals they liked; but who is to pay for all this scum to be incarcerated for life? Average prisoner is $2000 per day for incarceration...how much is a 9mm round? So there is even more financial sense. Or the best of both worlds, allow them to have 3 appeals and then when they fail all three then they can be killed.
Sicarium · 46-50, M
@L33TH4X0R
No, it's not. It's enough for people who are swayed by emotional arguments. I am not.
And nobody has, despite your dishonest suggestions otherwise.
With that, I'm going to step away before you take the accusations any further. You clearly haven't thought this through.
...wich is enough for a normal sane person.
No, it's not. It's enough for people who are swayed by emotional arguments. I am not.
Nobody normal would condone the abuse of a child
And nobody has, despite your dishonest suggestions otherwise.
With that, I'm going to step away before you take the accusations any further. You clearly haven't thought this through.
L33TH4X0R · 41-45, M
@Sicarium By talking incessantly about the microscopic number of false positives as justification for saying no....is insane! As I said in my precious comment, lock them up for life and then after they have failed their appeals...and I'm sure if they were "innocent" then it would be discovered by then. Then kill them. Simple as, there is no need for a discussion. If they are innocent then "God" can judge them and give them an eternity of paradise for being a martyr.