You ever wonder if rich people get off on poor people starving to death?

@lacsar our culture regularly rewards bad behavior, with success.
it is true honest men can get rich, but they better be smart too. the old way, of doing something intrinsically valuable has been replaced by one con game after another.
remeber the bank bailout?
Seven, Hundred BILLION dollars given to the very ones that crashed the economy, much of that was given as salaries and bonuses and stock holder payouts
what is honest about that?

@lacsar oh i do I do! and i find both forms of reasoning to be useful and complimentary. the are not one or the other but dual parts of inquiry
What is wrong with facts? is 700billion dollars total and utter bullshit?

do YOU understand logical fallacies. I think you should examine that, starting with ad hominem attacks.
being insulting is not an argument, it is the linguistic form of a monkey, hurling shit.
if you want to have a debate, you need data, and structure, not just what you heard some pundit say.

step up,,
Your turn

again with the name calling. 🙄



so every use of syllogism is not relevant?
deductive reasoning, was invented outside of mathematics, good old Aristotle, and company

all dogs are Canines
Billy is a dog
thus billy is a Canine

Only Rude people call other people names.
Lacsar, calls peole names
thus Lacsar is a rude person

Please refute this classical example of a deductive reasoning


oh and you have not addressed any of my premises. only cast doubt on my mentation.
so far.
that means I win.

@lacsar
how about a source for that? do you suggest logic did not exist before whatever grade of mathematics is your specialty?
never had to take forensic debate did you?

denigration is not a logical position, you have yet to use ONE logical argument, just rude posturing as tho you were only a troll but I wish for more than that.


I see you were unable to marshal a refutation of those deductive syllogisms,

NO conditional statement
no stated hypothesis
no conclusion

you could have said

All ignorant idiots disagree with me
AMy disagrees with me
thus amy is an ignorant idiot
which is valid, but not sound as is the case since the premise is invalid.

[b]so I win again![/b]

i hope you treat your dog better than you treat people

@lacsar so you cannot refute my logic?

your other responses in this thread were all mean spirited and insulting, you haven't written Bitch yet..

oh god your not a Dog show guy are you? what a shit show those are!
watch Best in Show, a movie about you!

if so then all the places are the same, and a canine has little interest in what country he is in
hmm les see in the last 2 years.
Cyprus, Crete, Turkey, Spain, Norway, Holland, Denmark
Cape verde. Portugal, Brazil Mexico, Canada, Blackrock,
a variety of Caribbean islands, and Japan, ( 2 1/2 years since that one, sorry)

I am beginning to doubt you are a mathematician at all, you seem to have no skill in logic

you certainly seem unable to refute a simple syllogism

kinda like some cross bred terrier chihuahua mix, snarling and snapping at my Stately pure bred Logic.

but you aren't amusing!
come one
ONE Time
use logic, in some meaningful way other that to say it doesn't exist outside your closed and myopic life.

see? i can be insulting too. it is just not as satisfying as intellectual congress, so sadly lacking in you.
oh And i can do this longer than you.