Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | New | Old
Lostinthefog · 51-55, M
Which version of creationism? The Christian version only? Or will you include some of the Native American versions? The Hindu? Any of the African versions? Anything that comes from a religious belief does NOT belong in a science class. Now, if you want a religious studies course that touches on multiple creation stories, that's just fine. But they do not belong in, nor should they even be mentioned, in a science class.
room101 · 51-55, M
@Lostinthefog I'm a Greek Orthodox Christian and I couldn't agree with you more.
Lostinthefog · 51-55, M
I just don't get it. I grew up Methodist, and there was NEVER any issue with the separation of the crration story and evolution. It was easily accepted that they both worked together.
room101 · 51-55, M
@Lostinthefog Same for me. Same for all of the Italian Catholics that I know. Same for all of the European Protestants that I know. Same for all of the Jews that I know.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SW-User
@IstillmissEP oh yeah i remember this 🤣
SW-User
Yes. Both are theories that ultimately need to be accepted by faith. Creationists should not feel threatened by evolution being taught and vice versa. Each student should be taught all views equally and be allowed to make their own choice.
Lostinthefog · 51-55, M
I'm not a biologist. My daughter could tell you. If you truly want to know, and truly want to refute evolution, I suggest you actually study and discuss it with actual experts rather than believing what people who really don't have any idea are telling you. I took enough science courses to know the generalities and basic facts supporting evolution, enough to know there ARE tons of facts to support the theory. Specifics beyond that, you need to actually research and find what those who know what they are doing and done the work know.
Ynotisay · M
@SW-User Yeah. You're probably right. I'd say making a man from dirt then stealing a rib and making a woman is probably the better call. Of course, them having two sons put a little crimp in the plan. Looks like one of them must have gotten Mommy pregnant. Freaky.
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
@SW-User cells don't carry information (what do you feel is being informed?).

Abiogenesis (the origin of life) is a separate topic from evolution.

One can (and should) discuss one without reference to the other.
you teach natural selection and evolution in science class.

you teach creationism in religion class.

not sure why this is so controversial.

when people of faith feel science attacks their religion it is really a sign that their faith is weak and based in materialism. many of the greatest scientists have been people of faith. so no arranging of curriculum is going to fix that.
room101 · 51-55, M
No! Absolutely not.
firefall · 61-69, M
provided one is taught in science and the other in religious studies
SW-User
@firefall good point
This message was deleted by its author.
katielass · F
This is actually an interesting subject. Look up Madalyn Murray O'Hair. She filed her first lawsuit in 1960 and the separation of church and state began. It was in the early 60's if my memory serves me, that reading of the Bible and school prayer ceased.
This message was deleted by its author.
katielass · F
@SW-User I wrote a paper on her once.
katielass · F
No, parents should teach their kids about the origin of man.
SW-User
@katielass this 👌
katielass · F
@SW-User Of course I realize that means a lot of teachers would be fired. But is it about teaching the kids or is it about someone having a secure job regardless of whether or not they can actually do the job.
room101 · 51-55, M
@katielass The question is very specific and does not encompass the other academic disciplines that you have listed. Apart from science. Does the "origin of man" not fall under the purview of science?

Perhaps I should clarify. The question I put to you was purely in the context of the original question posed. Therefore, I was expecting an answer that was congruent to the topic. Not a deflection about maths and English.
No, not in public schools. We have enough of other peoples religion all ready, "In God We Trust", "God Bless America" the statement and the song, hand on the bible "Do you swear to....so help you god" I don't think we will see an atheist/agnostic in the WH in the near future. And Some people have said that the Anti-Christ is already there now.
SW-User
@softspokenman They just have to hide it. I think there have been many, at least agnostics, in the WH, but you are right, they can't admit it.
@SW-User, I wonder what would happen if we changed to; "We Trust In Evolution" or "Evolution Blessed America" ?
SW-User
Should the "Sermon on the Mount" be taught in a chemistry class?
Wishingwellguy · 46-50, M
Someone’s been reading Dan Brown
Ynotisay · M
Public school? Ab-so-freaking-lutely not.
Let Christian schools brainwash children. Taxpayers should not be on the hook for that.
newstu · M
sure, why not.... clear as mud

 
Post Comment