This is what a person was fired and then named and shamed for? You're joking, right?
https://www.google.com/amp/gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-diversity-screed-1797564320/amp Right, so this is what the guy from Google was fired for writing. I'm failing to see him as a sexist. I don't agree 100% with everything he says, but he is definitely not sexist. The actual bit that he wrote starts with the first grey box in the article. I think I managed to pinpoint how far most people who started writing articles about how sexist he is started seeing red too and that would be right about here:
After reading and seeing the response to this memo, I'm left wondering how many people actually read it before posting about it and writing articles about it.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
@Fernie I linked the entire memo, that's what that jacked up link is, I can try linking it again if that doesn't work. My screencap was just my guess on where people started to get angry and not read and actually think about what is being said in it.
@Fernie Then read the memo? If I was trying to hide anything, I wouldn't have linked it. Like I said, I don't agree with everything he says. However, after reading the whole thing, I wonder how many others actually read the whole thing.
@Fernie So I'm hiding something unintentionally from my subjective interpretation of what was written. I see..your comment was extremely constructive, thank you for helping me to understand your point of view.
@Fernie How did I misinterpret it exactly? I'm not being a drama queen, I just responded because maybe you would have a contrasting view point, which you seem to. We wouldn't be still having this back and forth right now if you had either not responded to my initial response or said fuck off. Either would have received the same result, which is we wouldn't be talking right now.
