We have just released a Downvote button. It can be found in the same place of the Reactions.
This reaction is invisible to users, including the owner of the post.
However, it is possible to know how many downvotes a post or comment has.
If it is anonymous/invisible, what is the point of it?
Please note that downvoting a Post or a Comment will cause a penalty to the other user's post.
Downvoting a post gives the message to SW that this specific Post is not good.
Getting too many downvotes will cause the Post/Comment to be pushed down (less visibility).
There is NO Meaningful Penalty that is inflicted upon other users, by Downvoting their posts. There will be very negligible impact on any internal "User Reputation" metrics. Even much less impact than "Reporting" a user (which has existed since the beginning of SW).
Abuse, misuse or manipulation
Users are not allowed to abuse, misuse or manipulate Reaction and Downvote features, whether manually, programmatically or otherwise. This includes using multiple accounts to react/downvote, or asking people to react/downvote, or forming or joining a group that reacts/downvotes together.
Abuse or misuse of the Downvote may end up in your account being penalized and limited. We will be alerted of any suspicions of abuse and manipulation attempts.
Downvote vs. Upset Reaction
Downvote has a different meaning to the "Upset" reaction. Downvote means you Dislike the Post/Comment itself. Upset means you are unhappy with the story/news, etc... and causes no bad impact to the user who posted it.
---
Thank you for your support and we hope you continue to stay with us.
We are constantly listening to your suggestions, so please keep giving them to us, as they are very important to the future of Similar Worlds.
Very kind regards, 🧡 - The SW Team
=== UPDATE ===
Alright everyone - I apologize for not being clear on my post above. What I meant with:
"Getting too many downvotes will cause account restrictions (just like Abuse Reports do)" (which I've removed from my post above, to avoid confusion to other readers)
was more to tell that the Downvote is a "negative reaction", as Reports are also a "negative feature".
My initial intention was to tell those users who were asking to be downvoted, and others who were downvoting their posts, that doing so could cause an impact on the other user's account reputation.
However, Downvoting is in no way as harsh as Reporting is! (I apologize for the confusion)
We will for sure not allow misuse/manipulation either way, but no one will be suspended from Similar Worlds just because a post got 10 downvotes, for example. (unless, of course, the post was highly offensive, which in that case should be Reported to us)
I hope this clarifies some bits.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
You keep saying you hope we stay, but it feels like you’re trying to get us to break up with you. A few might like this, but mostly I just see vindictive downvoting you won’t be able to prevent or be fair about. We have block and mute to customize our experience without affecting another’s right to be. We have reports for those bad apples that show up in every bunch. Why is this not enough? Nobody needs the power to minimize or drive anyone else away based on their whims or personal preferences.
We have block and mute to customize our experience without affecting another’s right to be.
Exactly. And if they wanted to allow us to further customize how our personal feeds show they could have just had a "see less of this content" button instead of a feature. Simple as that. No need to shame people or add further negativity. There's already enough negativity on this site.
near the bottom it says they hope we continue to stay.
They've said lately a lot that they want to grow the site. Considering how this venture is going it would seem they hope we stay, but it doesn't matter even if it costs the majority of the current userbase so long as they can grow. You know, the concept of being okay sacrificing 50 of your current users to gain 65 new ones for a net growth of 10 users. Numbers are obviously not accurate, but the point gets across. Feels like it is all about net gain whatever the cost.