Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

☑ SW Verification Mark without Public Photo 📩

Poll - Total Votes: 195
I like the current User Verification feature - 1 Badge Mode - No changes needed
I would like SW to have the other Verification Badge Modes
I do not like this Verification photo feature at all
Show Results
You may vote on multiple answers.
[b]Hello SW members! :)
Thank you for the feedback thus far regarding our new [u]User Verification feature[/u], and thank you also to those who have tried out this feature![/b]

We understand completely why some users may not feel completely happy with this feature, specifically [b]those who prefer not to have a public image of themselves on SW, yet would like to have the "Verified" icon appearing next to their username[/b].

This feature [i](the ☑ badge)[/i] was originally/mostly intended mostly to combat the ever growing issue of users being tricked and "catfished" on SW, by those claiming to be someone who they are not (sharing fake/stolen photos).

Those who post (or share privately) images of themselves (or images claiming to be them) can use this feature to help verify that they are indeed the person in those images.

This portion of our verification feature [i](the badge)[/i] was intended for users who are more public about themselves (photos), and not really aimed at those who enjoy using SW anonymously.

(The other half of this feature, the initial verification photo, is mainly for security/account recovery purposes).

We do understand that it still can seem unfair to many other loyal users, as they too cannot have such a badge without being public about their appearance.

[sep]

The SW Staff has not yet come to a conclusion regarding if and how we can improve this issue, however, we would like to put forward a potential idea.


[b][u]Would you prefer if SW offered different modes of the Verification Status (Badge)?[/u][/b]


[b]• [u]Publicly Verified[/u][/b] - Verification Photo visible to all SW Members

[b]• [u]Visible to other Verified Users[/u][/b] - Verification Photo only visible to other users who have also verified up to this level.

[b]• [u]Visible to SW Staff Only[/u][/b] - Verification Photo only visible to SW Staff.


[c=#BF0000][b]Please note that with each decreasing level, users will have less ability to verify whether or not a user is the person being claimed in their shared images.[/b][/c]

[i]For example:[/i]
[quote]You, a SW member, may be chatting with another user who has the Verified Grey Badge [i](Visible to SW Staff Only)[/i].

We the SW Staff will not be able to always monitor whether or not this user is sharing true images of themselves (nor do we monitor what users share privately), after having already been verified.
Neither would you or the rest of SW members have access to their "Staff Only" verification photo, to be able to cross-check their identity.

In this case, members would need to use more discretion when it comes to trusting who the user claims to be in their shared photos (since you are unable to see the already approved verification photos).

This is a concern to us, especially for new users who may join the site, and could be misled regarding the authenticity of certain other SW users.[/quote]


[b]We would like to hear your thoughts and feedback!

What do you think about this idea regarding the various Verification Badge modes?[/b]

Do you fully understand how and why the other more private modes of the verification photo (while having a badge) can be potentially used to mislead members?

Please share your opinions, suggestions, thoughts on this new Verification feature and how we may be able to improve it.

Thank you,
[i][c=#005E2F]-The SW Team[/c][/i]

[sep]

[c=#004A59][big]Updates:[/big][/c]

[u]Regarding the option of having [b]"Friends Only see your Verification Photo"[/b].[/u]

This defeats a lot of the purpose of this verification feature, and is about equivalent of using the "Staff Only" option, while posting the image also to your "Friends Only" album.

The issue with this idea is that someone can easily have:

[b]• 0 Friends.
• All Friends are alternate accounts of their own.[/b]

It is not a useful way of adding trust to someone's verification.

The reason why we opt to have other Verified users be able to see the photo (as the 2nd option), is that there is more validity in this method, as other users who are not directly connected to you, and are verified/trusted themselves, can also verify your own photo identity for the rest of the site.

[sep]

[b][u]Regarding Not having other options of Account Recovery or Verification[/u][/b]

We [b][u]will[/u][/b] be looking into having other options for recovering your SW account in case of loss, such as: [b]Recovery Questions, Secondary Email Address, Phone Number[/b], etc...

Please keep in mind that we cannot develop everything at once. :)

Now that we have more feedback and new concerns from users, we can address such issues.


[c=#800000][Note: This was never a major concern to users before we released this new photo verification feature today, so we are a bit surprised that some are very upset for us not yet having other recovery options][/c] :)
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SW-User
I think even in case that verification idea cannot be tricked with photo editors, it doesn't verify the account. It only verify the picture.

So, why not making it a photo verification system not account verification. So that the "verified" icon is showed near the photo whenever it's used. Yet, all accounts are displayed the same to avoid discrimination as if verified accounts are more trustworthy.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Miram · 31-35, F
@SW-User At least your argument makes sense and isn't loaded drama.

I think it wouldn't hurt to simply add a badge to the profile [i]verified picture[/i].

But the same can be made about those with a VIP next to their names.

Discrimination and harassment seems to happen towards both groups, those verified for being verified and those who aren't. Reinforcing the TOS more solves that instead of tending to people's comfort zones.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Miram · 31-35, F
@ArcaneAlex I didn't see her breaking the TOS but you are doing that now. Your comments qualify as harassment and lack evidence.
SW-User
@Miram Right. People would always find things to discriminate about. But I think adding more and more "labels" as part of the website just help it getting worse.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
Miram · 31-35, F
@SW-User I think this one is showing the true colors of people. People will move on from this subject just like they moved on from the VIP discussion. And I am sure the negativity of the website falls on its members just as much.

It is such a trivial thing to be upset about and have a mass outrage.
SW-User
@Miram I agree except that I'm not sure it's very trivial to suddenly divide users into "verified" and "none-verified". I think even the VIP thing shouldn't be with a badge as it doesn't make a user better. If the VIP badge isn't meant to say loudly that a VIP user is "better" then what else is it meant for?
SW-User
@SW-User mine is to let my stalker know I can now see them if they come on my profile
SW-User
@SW-User Good idea 😊
Miram · 31-35, F
@SW-User it'd have been fine to make that distinction, not based on the picture alone.
It is trivial because most people aren't complaining about the division nor care to close that gap by contributing less in the drama. They are complaining about other things. The post opened a door and not many are closing it.