This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
DeWayfarer · 61-69, M
I don't believe that is the case. And for all the reasons that I gave on a previous post of yours.
What is not a good sign is this separation of the classes, where the wealthy all live in one area and the middle class must share with the very poor.
It builds resentment between the poor and the middle class. And the wealthy can avoid the whole situation. Even secludes the wealthy from actually helping with the situation.
What you don't see just simply doesn't exist.
This applies to the middle class and poor as well. For they don't see just how wealthy the very wealthy are.
Also why the middle class are often for the wealthy. They blame their problems on the poor. And don't see that the wealthy don't want any part of either one.
What is not a good sign is this separation of the classes, where the wealthy all live in one area and the middle class must share with the very poor.
It builds resentment between the poor and the middle class. And the wealthy can avoid the whole situation. Even secludes the wealthy from actually helping with the situation.
What you don't see just simply doesn't exist.
This applies to the middle class and poor as well. For they don't see just how wealthy the very wealthy are.
Also why the middle class are often for the wealthy. They blame their problems on the poor. And don't see that the wealthy don't want any part of either one.