This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
greenmountaingal · 80-89, F
Look, I can understand not liking a candidate, but how do you justify such an extreme opinion?
I've looked at his presidential plans, and while there are quite a few poor things there, there doesn't seem to be anything that justifies such an opinion?
I've looked at his presidential plans, and while there are quite a few poor things there, there doesn't seem to be anything that justifies such an opinion?
Oh, the hypocrisy.
How do you justify the extreme things that orange mess has said ???
How do you justify the extreme things that orange mess has said ???
which ones? I'm not in the US so I don't get to hear every single word he said. However whenever I ask someone to point out his extremism you just sling insults rather than an actual argument...
greenmountaingal · 80-89, F
@LacaTheSecond: The things he has said are their own arguments against his candidacy. For instance, I don't accept the concept he puts forth that his statements made in the past about women are acceptable or at least not indicative of his true character because they were, in his words in the recent debate, "locker room talk." That doesn't cut it for me.
however Clinton stating that the public should remain obedient and unaware is ok somehow?
And I guess that you believe that he'll create a law which takes away women's rights because of that?
And I guess that you believe that he'll create a law which takes away women's rights because of that?
greenmountaingal · 80-89, F
@LacaTheSecond: He could put justices on the Supreme Court. That could seriously impact human rights.
Hillary Clinton is a poor alternative in many ways. But she IS the alternative. And her connections as Secretary of State and experience make her-perhaps unfortunately--the better choice.
Hillary Clinton is a poor alternative in many ways. But she IS the alternative. And her connections as Secretary of State and experience make her-perhaps unfortunately--the better choice.
ahahah thats a ridiculous double standard.
You claim that he's a risk to human rights because he said the word pussy. However she's better even though the leaked e-mails show that she was fully aware of the fact that her campaign donors Qatar and Saudi Arabia are "comprehensively supporting ISIS and Al-Qaeda back in 2014?
Not to mention the fact that she publicly accused Lewinsky of lying, only to later admit that what she was saying was true? Also he said what he did a decade before his entrance into politics, she said it as the first lady?
I mean lets be real here, there isn't a single person who has been proven to be less trustworthy than her in politics. And that's without mentioning her criminal conduct when deleting her E-mails and attacking the multiple women who have accused her husband of rape.... By your own logic you'd have to think she is going to remove rape laws because of that?
You claim that he's a risk to human rights because he said the word pussy. However she's better even though the leaked e-mails show that she was fully aware of the fact that her campaign donors Qatar and Saudi Arabia are "comprehensively supporting ISIS and Al-Qaeda back in 2014?
Not to mention the fact that she publicly accused Lewinsky of lying, only to later admit that what she was saying was true? Also he said what he did a decade before his entrance into politics, she said it as the first lady?
I mean lets be real here, there isn't a single person who has been proven to be less trustworthy than her in politics. And that's without mentioning her criminal conduct when deleting her E-mails and attacking the multiple women who have accused her husband of rape.... By your own logic you'd have to think she is going to remove rape laws because of that?
greenmountaingal · 80-89, F
@LacaTheSecond: She is a classic power politics candidate with all the dishonesty which that description implies. But she IS still better than Trump.
I'll ask once again, based on what? The only arguments you people seem to have against him are "he said the word pussy" in 2005
The single most important aspect of any presidents job is the state of the economy and the safety of the people.
She has proven a liability to safety and her plan for the economy is catastrophic.
PS: dishonesty isn't the main issue with her, it's the fact that she has time and time again acted directly against the interest of the people.
I mean it's ridiculous that the very same people who were denouncing the large corporations as criminals and calling Saudi Arabia out for it's human rights abuses somehow now seem to be ok with having a president who has proven to be more than corrupt.
You people seem to only have emotional arguments against him and for her, and even those are flawed.......
The single most important aspect of any presidents job is the state of the economy and the safety of the people.
She has proven a liability to safety and her plan for the economy is catastrophic.
PS: dishonesty isn't the main issue with her, it's the fact that she has time and time again acted directly against the interest of the people.
I mean it's ridiculous that the very same people who were denouncing the large corporations as criminals and calling Saudi Arabia out for it's human rights abuses somehow now seem to be ok with having a president who has proven to be more than corrupt.
You people seem to only have emotional arguments against him and for her, and even those are flawed.......