It is ironic that most of the people who believe in Darwinian evolution are liberal, when Charles Darwins theory is an extremely racial theory;

a racial supremacist theory that was adopted by the elite up until 30-40 years ago when all the racial stuff started getting big in America.

The anglo saxon atheist people who followed him thought that they were the superior race and that they deserved to colonize the whole world because they were the superior race. They got all of that from Charles Darwin. Just read his racial views in Descent of man and you will see.

Not to mention, it is even in the very title of the book origin of species; the sub title is the preservation of the favored races in the struggle for life. No one ever quotes the whole title.

Also notice how the alt right and more intellectually minded race realist white nationalist types always base their "science" of race on evolution. Without evolution, all of their racial ideas collapse. If you believe in Darwinian evolution, you have to believe in a superiority of certain races.

The only way all races can be equal is if God designed them, which He did. And God said in His Word that he hath created all nations of one blood.

Praise the Lord Jesus Christ. The truth shall set you free.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Northwest · M

Darwin was the first to publish on evolution, but evolution is not Darwinism.

This would be like semiconductor physics, and everything it spawned, is Shockley'ism, and it's hypocritical to be an electrical engineer, just because Shockley was a white supremacist.

Diotrephes · 70-79, M

@Northwest The Bible teaches evolution.

Wisdom 19:18-20 (CEB) = "18 If we are careful to observe events, we can see just how the elements of the universe are transformed. It’s the same transformation that happens when someone changes the sounds that a harp makes by changing the key while continuing to play the same melody. 19 In this way, land animals were changed into underwater creatures, while animals that swam in the waters now moved onto the land. 20 Fire was able to burn on the open water, while water forgot that it was supposed to put fire out."

SW-User

@Diotrephes The book of wisdom is not the Bible, as it is not a part of canon or inspired. This is an apocryphal work, on the same level of Enoch, jasher, book of the bee and others. Yes, some apocryphal books were once included in the Bible, but even then they were only placed in the middle of the Bible between both testaments, because they were never recognized as inspired, but merely historical works for reference.

Northwest · M

@Diotrephes I really don't want to make this a religious debate. I was only commenting on the inaccuracy of the OP's statement.

Diotrephes · 70-79, M

@SW-User The book of Wisdom was part of the original Bible and it was only deleted from the "Protestant" version in 1881. If you are reading the Bible with the Apocrypha then you are reading an incomplete Bible.

Diotrephes · 70-79, M

@Northwest It's not a religious debate. The statement was inaccurate since people recognized the evolutionary process in action centuries before Darwin.