Science & Technology

Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

It is ironic that most of the people who believe in Darwinian evolution are liberal, when Charles Darwins theory is an extremely racial theory;

a racial supremacist theory that was adopted by the elite up until 30-40 years ago when all the racial stuff started getting big in America.

The anglo saxon atheist people who followed him thought that they were the superior race and that they deserved to colonize the whole world because they were the superior race. They got all of that from Charles Darwin. Just read his racial views in Descent of man and you will see.

Not to mention, it is even in the very title of the book origin of species; the sub title is the preservation of the favored races in the struggle for life. No one ever quotes the whole title.

Also notice how the alt right and more intellectually minded race realist white nationalist types always base their "science" of race on evolution. Without evolution, all of their racial ideas collapse. If you believe in Darwinian evolution, you have to believe in a superiority of certain races.

The only way all races can be equal is if God designed them, which He did. And God said in His Word that he hath created all nations of one blood.

Praise the Lord Jesus Christ. The truth shall set you free.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

BlueVeins · 22-25

The anglo saxon atheist people who followed him thought that they were the superior race and that they deserved to colonize the whole world because they were the superior race.

The idea you're referring to adopts the language of evolution, but has basically nothing to do with what the theory of evolution actually says. Darwinian evolution doesn't give any moral prescriptions at all; it's a purely descriptive model that seeks to explain the origin of species. Hence the name of his book, The Origin of Species.

Even then, evolution doesn't speak of "superior races" or even superior species. Species are just adapted to the environments they evolved in. Sure, some adapt better than others in those narrow parameters, but still, there's a reason why there are so many billions of species on this planet; none can garner anything close to universal dominance.

That actually applies fairly well to clades of humans. White people are better adapted to live in Europe because our light skin absorbs the scant vitamin D better, while black people are better adapted to live in Africa bc their dark skin protects them from UV light (and obv this applies across climate zones on other continents). But those differences are fairly trivial, now that we have gummy vitamins and sunblock.

1-25 of 30

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@BlueVeins Superior races is in Darwin's title.

OogieBoogie · F

@hippyjoe1955 no...its not.

SW-User

@OogieBoogie Yes it is. PRESERVATION OF THE FAVORED RACES. Favored races. You got that, right?

OogieBoogie · F

@SW-User favoured races means what evolution favoured.

Are you serously trying to say darwin had a say in how evolution of our species, over thousands of years , changed and developed?😏
That he got to choose?😂

Good grief , this is painful !🤦‍♀️

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@OogieBoogie No it means that some races are superior to others. The whites were determined to be superior to the blacks. If you don't know your history......

OogieBoogie · F

@hippyjoe1955 no, it means, that as our species grew , bred , migrated and such , some characteristics were favoured over others.
So much so that they became distinct ethnic features.

Dear lawd , it's like im teaching class all over again 🙄

OogieBoogie · F

@hippyjoe1955 and you really should send me flowers if youre gonna give me this much attention 🤗

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@OogieBoogie If you think this is about you you truly are a very shallow thinker. You are just some pixels on my screen. The ideas those pixels convey are what I am showing as being utter foolishness.

OogieBoogie · F

@hippyjoe1955 hey im not the one arguing science as proof of genetic predisposition one minute, then creationism the next.

Are ya jealous its not all about you ?

Its ok .

Its evolution ....im prettier 😜💋

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@OogieBoogie

hey im not the one arguing science

There fixed your comment. You are not arguing science because you don't know any science. You and science are complete strangers.

OogieBoogie · F

@hippyjoe1955 so...you are now literally changing my words to suit your argument ?

😄😄😄

I dont think you need me for this conversation any more ....seems you have now taken over both sides of it to suit youself .😂

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@OogieBoogie I am simply editing it to what is obvious to anyone with a science background.

OogieBoogie · F

@hippyjoe1955 you are changing others words to suit yourself.

But hey ...if that's what you need to do to make yourself feel good .

Go for it honey .

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@OogieBoogie No just clarifying what you actually said. You used too many words to tell everyone that you don't have a science background.

OogieBoogie · F

@hippyjoe1955 its so cute how you think if you 're-write the words' , it makes it true in the world in your mind .
You know thats a desperation move right ?

But im flattered. Being threatened by my reasoning to have to convince yourself to make up not only my words, but also my background, is very complimentary.

Are you making me into a fantasy darling ?
Its all so adorable 💋

hippyjoe1955 · 70-79, M

@OogieBoogie I am simply pointing out what is obvious to one and all. You and science are strangers.

OogieBoogie · F

@hippyjoe1955 oh sweety...you really need your delusions dont you?

Its ok....they say people revert to a fantasy land as a coping mechanism.

Diotrephes · 70-79, M

@BlueVeins Have you ever actually thought about what you wrote? Groups of people from all races live in all areas of the world where they did not before. So, if those groups stay intact and continue to live in those new areas, how long will it be before Whites become Blacks in Africa, Blacks become Whites in Europe, everyone in America & Canada become tinted like American Indians, and so forth around the world?

Even though people have different physical characteristics they are essentially identical. That is still true despite the thousands of years it has taken for humans to alter their skins.

BlueVeins · 22-25

@Diotrephes It'll never happen because the modern global transportation system isn't conducive to regional genetic differences.

Diotrephes · 70-79, M

@BlueVeins Lots of Black people became Whites in America in less than 400 years. In some instances people couldn't tell one from another even when they married them.

Whites have been in South Africa for almost 200 years. They might all be Black within a couple hundred more years.

BlueVeins · 22-25

@Diotrephes What are you talking about? Black people didn't "become whites," white and black people intermarried and had mixed race kids. Obviously some of those mixed race kids would eventually have so much more white blood in 'em that they'd be typically identified as white, but it's kinda a stretch to say that they "became whites."

Diotrephes · 70-79, M

@BlueVeins Did you know that America has had 6 Black Presidents?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African_heritage_of_presidents_of_the_United_States

OogieBoogie · F

@BlueVeins i think we are going to become a more homoginised looking race in the future .

With racism fading (ever too slowly), global travel ( as you mentioned), and people being able to love who they chose, instead of marrying who they must, crossing of ethnicities will increase. We wont be fully black , or white , or yellow , or red, or tan - we will become a bit of everything.

My worry is , its mankinds failing: to "define and place" people in hierarchies.
I fear we will make something else will take the place of 'race' .😞

Its a sad fact, it only takes a few to destroy equality .

BlueVeins · 22-25

@OogieBoogie I think somewhere down the line, it's either gonna be a 'brown' global race like you say, or transhumanism, whichever comes first. Honestly, I'm fairly optimistic about humanity's distant future; sure, we'll still likely have class divides for a very long time, but even those are marginally less disgusting when they're not backed by a completely stagnant and unchanging physical feature.

That's not to advocate for complacency, we still obv have to go a long time between now and the end of race as we know it. And all the environmental disaster caused disproportionately by white people countries that disproportionally hurts brown & black people countries is adding lots of turbulence.

OogieBoogie · F

@BlueVeins yeah....its all so fucked up , and has been for too long .

I think we are going to break somewhere first.
Those that 'have' , fear losing it.
Greed begets greed.
Thise types are fighting AGAINST change. Living in their clean white techno homes , while they drown the world in crap and toxins .
We wont see change till either their poison starts affecting them, or the masses rise up, or mass consciousness starts to happen, (which i think is why we are all being coerced to staying 'plugged in ' to our petty online lives )

Ok...im ranting .But i swear , we cant keep going this way for much longer.

1-25 of 30