Random
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | New | Old
OldBrit · 61-69, M
Whole reason it's January was some Roman administration thing. They needed to appoint some console or something but that could only be done at start of the year, middle of March then. So they moved beginning of the year to January 1st. Now you think they could just have change the other rule but 🤷🏼‍♂
helenS · 36-40, F
@OldBrit The word "October" is a relic from the days when the new year started in March. "October" means "Eighth", it's the 8th month when you start counting from March.
OldBrit · 61-69, M
@helenS September, November, December similarly
JustNik · 51-55, F
@OldBrit Politicians never change. 🤣

Lugwho · 61-69, M
We waited till 1752 to adopt the new fangled calendar in the Kingdom of Great Britain, as it was then. At the same time we moved the first day of the year from 25th March to 1st January. So, Happy New Year, in three months!
JustNik · 51-55, F
@Lugwho Oh it’s a game! I thought it sounded like October was an unpleasant month where you are. 🤣 I’ll just hope it’s klutz-friendly. 😅
Lugwho · 61-69, M
@JustNik Played in the autumn, with horse chestnuts.

[media=https://youtu.be/XEAMLWKY9ck]
JustNik · 51-55, F
@Lugwho somebody’s getting hurt. 😂
OldBrit · 61-69, M
Ps the reason Gregory XIII needed new calendar was because the earth being inconsiderate and not rotating exactly to a whole number of days. The Nicene council had long ago fixed Easter to a date determined by the vernal equinox. But without leap years etc that was moving out of position. Hence the "We need to reset here" and the add a day every 4 years unless the year is divisible by 100 unless that is also divisible by 400. Hence why 2000 was a leap year, 3000 will not be.
JustNik · 51-55, F
@OldBrit I knew someone would remember more than me! 😄 Thinking it’ll be nothing short of a miracle if anyone’s around to notice no leap year in 3000. 😂

 
Post Comment