Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

If you thought Trump was a con and corrupt , the following will leave you no doubt. When you think it couldn´t get worse....

Trump is considering firing Special Counsel former FBI Director Robert Mueller, appointed by the Department of Justice to lead the investigation into ties between Trump’s campaign and Russian officials.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-robert-mueller-firing_us_593f1d38e4b02402687c50d4?m=false&ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009

THIS STINKS TO HIGH HEAVEN, MURICANS.

IMPEACH THAT ORANGE MESS NOW !!
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
krf336 · M
first of all, the reason there was a special counsel appointed was to investigate collusion between the president and Russia.... the former director of the FBI just testified under oath that "there was no collusion, and that Trump was never under investigation between there was No evidence of anything." So the reason for the special counsel is pretty much mute.

Second of all, The special counsel was appointed by the Justice department so i am not even sure Trump could fire him. Although I am all for it since its been proven that there is no need for one... but even if he could he doesn't need to, by law the special counsel would have to recuse himself because of a conflict of interest, because he was the Boss, friend and mentor of the now former FBI director who Will now be a Primary witness. and guess who helped prep him for testimony before congress last week? OH it was Mueller the current special Counsel investigating the whole issue.....

If anythings stinks to high heaven its the collusion of the media and everyone else to hide the actual truth.

Huffington post... worthless even as toilet paper.
krf336 · M
Ughh, I never learn- when the logical argument wins the name calling follows.
Enjoy your world of hate, I hope for your sakes you never get what you want most.
Ynotisay · M
@krf336: Uh...I don't think you've been following this too closely. It's fine to have an opinion. But it's even BETTER if that opinion is based in fact.
I don't get guys like you. The word 'traitor' keeps coming to mind. You'll support a liar who is working AGAINST you AND the law because, I don't know, you're a poor, persecuted white man? Again, I just don't get it.
Well, like they say...SAD.
@Ynotisay: Well said. I agree.
krf336 · M
@Ynotisay:
I am sure you don't loose any sleep at night in your deep pit of sadness.

Ok, first of all, an opinion is not meant to be fact its meant to be an "opinion," A fact is not an opinion, it is a "fact."
and I haven't seen anything in your argument that was anything close to a fact? Actually I don't see any post from you that does anything except to offer an opinion about me, based on assumptions.

The word traitor is a strong word, I would add my own example as you have attempted "actively fighting against a legally elected president" is also a good example of "traitor."

You can whine all you want about the popular vote, the law is the law AND HE WON. So explain to me how losing your shit and making any and every wild accusation hoping something sticks to get him out of office is NOT "working against the law" (your words)

Despite all of this Bullshit about collusion with Russia not one bit of evidence has been able to prove that, the now Former FBI Director, the Department of Justice, several Congressional panels have all come forward and said there is NO EVIDENCE and NOTHING There. THIS IS A FACT SEE END OF POST IN CASE YOU ARE UNCLEAR ABOUT WHAT A FACT IS

Most accusations have been instead proven blatantly false. THIS IS A FACT

SO now here is your chance, Enlighten me with one FACT that trump has Lied about anything. (I don't know if you supported Clinton, But there is ample evidence that she lied under oath multiple times, and ACTUALLY TOOK money from countries like Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and others- I don't understand how anyone can actually believe that she would have been better??)

Enlighten me with One FACT that trump is working against the American People. (as far as I can tell, the news media and a portion of the American people are trying to work against him)

Enlighten me with one FACT that he is working against the Law.

Enlighten me with one fact that Proves you know better than me what the world is really like?

----------------------------------------------

Not that it will matter to you because fact is not what your interested in, But here are 14 sources within the government and media that have stated that there is NO Evidence of any collusion. These are FACTS on RECORD that I FOUND IN LESS THAN 30 SECONDS.


1. President Barrack Obama said it in a live news conference the week before he left office.

2. The New York Times
Nov. 1, 2016
"According to the newspaper, the FBI says there’s no definitive connection between Donald Trump and the Russian government, reaching that conclusion after a wide-ranging investigation. The Times cited law-enforcement officials who said any cyberattacks carried out were “aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Trump.” The FBI also found no conclusive evidence of deliberate communications between Trump and a Russian bank, that were alleged earlier."

3. James Clapper (Former Obama Director of National Intelligence)
March 5, 2017
“[Regarding] NSA, FBI…CIA…Director of National Intelligence (DNI), that had anything, that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians, there was no evidence of that included in our [January] report,” Clapper testified. He was asked, “…but does it exist?” He answered, “Not to my knowledge.”

James Clapper (again)
May 8, 2017
At a hearing, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) asked Clapper if it’s still accurate that he has no knowledge of the existence of evidence of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. Clapper replied, “It is.”

James Clapper (yet again)
May 28, 2017
On NBC, Clapper states that in looking at possible Russian collusion, “my dashboard warning light was clearly on” but “I have to say, at the time I left, I did not see any smoking gun certitude evidence of collusion.”

5: Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA)
June 4, 2017
On CNN, Sen. Warner is asked whether he has seen any evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign. He says: “There is a lot of smoke,” but “we have no smoking gun at this point.”

6. James Comey, then-FBI Director
March 20, 2017
Comey was asked if he agreed with former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Clapper who said there was “no evidence” of “collusion between the members of the Trump campaign and the Russians.” Comey replied, “I think he’s right about characterizing the [January] report which you all have read.”


7. Rep. Chris Stewart, (R-Utah, House Intelligence Committee)
March 20, 2017
“At this point, everyone on this dais should agree with Mr. Clapper because we in the committee have seen no evidence, zero, that would indicate that there was collusion or criminal wrongdoing between any members of the previous [sic] administration or campaign and Russian officials.”

8. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-California, House Intelligence Committee)  
April 2, 2017
When asked, “Can you say definitively that there was collusion, there were people affiliated with the Trump campaign who were working with Russians to time the release of damaging information about Hillary Clinton that had been hacked either from [Hillary campaign chair] John Podesta or the DNC?” Schiff replied, “I don’t think we can say anything definitively at this point.”


9. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California, Senate Intelligence Committee)
May 3, 2017
When asked if she had evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 presidential campaign, Feinstein replied, “Not at this time.”


10. Sen. Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia, Senate Intelligence Committee)
May 8, 2017
“People that might have said they were involved, to what extent they were involved, to what extent the president might have known about these people or whatever, there is nothing there from that standpoint that we have seen directly linking our president to any of that.”


11. President Donald Trump
May 9, 2017
In a letter of termination to FBI Director Comey, President Trump wrote that Comey had informed him “on three occasions that I am not under investigation.” (This has been independently confirmed by the FBI and Comey.)


12. Rep. Devin Nunes (R-California, House Intelligence Committee Chairman)
March 20, 2017
During a hearing, Nunes questioned then-FBI Director James Comey:
NUNES: Do you have any evidence that any current Trump White House or administration official coordinated with the Russian intelligence services?
COMEY: Not a question I can answer…
NUNES: Well, I think — I understand that…but I can tell you that we don’t have any evidence and we’re conducting our own investigation here.

13. Rep. Chris Stewart, (R-Utah, House Intelligence Committee)
March 20, 2017
“At this point, everyone on this dais should agree with Mr. Clapper because we in the committee have seen no evidence, zero, that would indicate that there was collusion or criminal wrongdoing between any members of the previous [sic] administration or campaign and Russian officials.”


source
https://sharylattkisson.com/11-times-dems-repubs-said-no-evidence-of-trump-russia-collusion-10-times-people-claimed-there-was/
krf336 · M
@Ynotisay: I PREDICT-- that the only response to this is either complete and utter silence or more attempts to use race and name calling to insinuate that I somehow "Just can't see the truth."

The fact that opinions like yours are accepted as absolute fact in stark contrast to reality is what is truly SAD.
Ynotisay · M
@krf336: I'll give you a response tiger. I stopped reading after the first sentence. I knew everything after that would be blah blah blah. Sorry. I prefer not to swim in swamps.
@Ynotisay: 🤣
krf336 · M
Afraid of reality. Enjoy your miserable existence