Fraud concerns about Semi Annual instead of quarterly reporting are misplaced.

[media=https://youtu.be/RXy4k0JA9OI]

Given all we know now, companies aren't likely to bury bad news, t hey're likely to put it right in front of investors and overemphasize it while burying good news in order to manage the expectations of analyst and get them to revise their estimates downward.

An Enron situation in this kind of environment could happen, but it's rare and unlikely, given that companies have far more incentive to report bad news. The lean today is toward burying GOOD news, not bad.

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

DeWayfarer · 61-69, M

FCC in-house response: Pass address to the DOJ for monitoring. File 69 please and block. 🤷🏻‍♂

ChatGPT analysis of this statement...

It's challenging to predict exact responses, but in general, during the Trump administration, the FCC's approach to public concerns—especially regarding media practices—tended to focus on deregulation and supporting business interests. Here's a breakdown of how such a scenario might be handled:

Likely Response from the FCC
Referral to the DOJ

If the FCC received a lengthy complaint about corporate media practices, they might choose to pass it along to the Department of Justice (DOJ), especially if the complaint raised potential legal issues, such as antitrust concerns or violations of broadcasting regulations.

Filing and Blocking

The mention of "File 69 please and block" could suggest a bureaucratic response where they might not pursue the complaint actively. Blocking can indicate that they opted not to engage with the issue further.

Prioritization of Resources

With limited resources, the FCC might prioritize complaints based on serious legal implications or significant public interest. A long rant about corporate media practices might not meet these criteria unless it presented compelling legal arguments or significant community concern.

Overall Tone and Approach

Given the political climate and priorities of the Trump administration, it’s possible that the FCC's response would be somewhat dismissive, focusing more on maintaining the status quo regarding corporate interests rather than addressing public grievances.